90,866
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject England/Navboxes: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject England/Navboxes (view source)
Revision as of 11:29, 24 January 2014
, 24 January 2014→ Second proposal - 2: reply
(→Scope: reply) |
(→ Second proposal - 2: reply) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This must be a preliminary idea of how to use the navboxes. On the Suffolk pages I have inserted it right into the Civil registration section [[Bedfield, Suffolk#Resources]]. There is no need to link to topics since they are already incorporated into the parish page. Then I have a link to the [[Suffolk Civil Registration]] page. Then I have a link to the [[Hoxne Hundred, Suffolk]] of which I could have called the Hoxne Deanery or ''Hoxne hundred or Deanry'' page. [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 07:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | This must be a preliminary idea of how to use the navboxes. On the Suffolk pages I have inserted it right into the Civil registration section [[Bedfield, Suffolk#Resources]]. There is no need to link to topics since they are already incorporated into the parish page. Then I have a link to the [[Suffolk Civil Registration]] page. Then I have a link to the [[Hoxne Hundred, Suffolk]] of which I could have called the Hoxne Deanery or ''Hoxne hundred or Deanry'' page. [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 07:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Hi Don, this is certainly a proposal that we can discuss and change as we understand all the issues in play. I like the ''Parishes in the Hundred and District of..'' navbox you have created. I notice that you have coded this directly in the parish page. Did you consider creating them as templates? The purpose of navboxes is to group together related links. So even though the topic links will be in the body of the article, they are also useful if repeated in a navbox at the end of the main article. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 18:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||