Jump to content

FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer: Difference between revisions

Line 27: Line 27:


:::The thing about "Media Coordinator" that worries me a little is that it may sound like a member of FamilySearch's marketing team who feeds information about the wiki to the media -- newspapers and genealogy magazine writers and such. If misunderstood that way, the title Media Coordinator might be construed as an authority figure in the wiki, which is something we wanted to avoid. (It's the same trouble we had with calling this role Moderator.) So I wonder if inserting Multi into the word would help clarify things. Then it would be a Multimedia Coordinator. (Makes for a long name, though. I prefer the short role names Wikipedia uses, like SysOps and Bots and such.) [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
:::The thing about "Media Coordinator" that worries me a little is that it may sound like a member of FamilySearch's marketing team who feeds information about the wiki to the media -- newspapers and genealogy magazine writers and such. If misunderstood that way, the title Media Coordinator might be construed as an authority figure in the wiki, which is something we wanted to avoid. (It's the same trouble we had with calling this role Moderator.) So I wonder if inserting Multi into the word would help clarify things. Then it would be a Multimedia Coordinator. (Makes for a long name, though. I prefer the short role names Wikipedia uses, like SysOps and Bots and such.) [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
My vote is to have a Reviewer that has a job (e.g. the missionaries) to review and upload, and to have an Uploader role for the people we trust and who get a free ticket to by-pass the image review process.  Uploader and Reviewer, both roles both names.
[[User:Jimgreene|Jimgreene]] 18:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


==== Vote today! Polls close 3 November @ 1:00 pm wiki time.<br>  ====
==== Vote today! Polls close 3 November @ 1:00 pm wiki time.<br>  ====
422

edits