15,660
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Reviewer (view source)
Revision as of 13:33, 2 November 2009
, 2 November 2009no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:::The thing about "Media Coordinator" that worries me a little is that it may sound like a member of FamilySearch's marketing team who feeds information about the wiki to the media -- newspapers and genealogy magazine writers and such. If misunderstood that way, the title Media Coordinator might be construed as an authority figure in the wiki, which is something we wanted to avoid. (It's the same trouble we had with calling this role Moderator.) So I wonder if inserting Multi into the word would help clarify things. Then it would be a Multimedia Coordinator. (Makes for a long name, though. I prefer the short role names Wikipedia uses, like SysOps and Bots and such.) [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | :::The thing about "Media Coordinator" that worries me a little is that it may sound like a member of FamilySearch's marketing team who feeds information about the wiki to the media -- newspapers and genealogy magazine writers and such. If misunderstood that way, the title Media Coordinator might be construed as an authority figure in the wiki, which is something we wanted to avoid. (It's the same trouble we had with calling this role Moderator.) So I wonder if inserting Multi into the word would help clarify things. Then it would be a Multimedia Coordinator. (Makes for a long name, though. I prefer the short role names Wikipedia uses, like SysOps and Bots and such.) [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 21:10, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
My vote is to have a Reviewer that has a job (e.g. the missionaries) to review and upload, and to have an Uploader role for the people we trust and who get a free ticket to by-pass the image review process. | My vote is to have a Reviewer that has a job (e.g. the missionaries) to review and upload, and to have an Uploader role for the people we trust and who get a free ticket to by-pass the image review process. Uploader and Reviewer, both roles both names. [[User:Jimgreene|Jimgreene]] 18:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Jimgreene|Jimgreene]] 18:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
OK, I surrender! In the interest of simplicity, I would like to see the title remain one work. So maybe "uploader" isn't so bad after all. [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 19:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
==== Vote today! Polls close 3 November @ 1:00 pm wiki time.<br> ==== | |||
{| | Okay, let's vote and narrow down what the name of this role should be. Please record your top 5 choices. Add three tildes to the User column to add your name as a link.<br> | ||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="97%" | |||
|- | |- | ||
| '''User''' | | '''User''' | ||
| Line 93: | Line 94: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[User:Molliewog|Mollie]] | | [[User:Molliewog|Mollie]] | ||
| Uploader | | Uploader | ||
| File Uploader | | File Uploader | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] | ||
| | | Uploader | ||
| | | Reviewer | ||
| | | Multimedia Reviewer or previewer | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||