FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject England/Navboxes: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→Scope: reply) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Scope == | == Scope == | ||
I did not realize that the Community Council's scope was to alter the navboxes nationwide in England. From the message I received, I understood that it was limited to a decision about Suffolk. If discussions are beginning on creating standardised navboxes nationwide, we definitely need to have a meeting so I can explain how I use these boxes and how they best perform. [[User:Murphynw|Murphynw]] 18:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | I did not realize that the Community Council's scope was to alter the navboxes nationwide in England. From the message I received, I understood that it was limited to a decision about Suffolk. If discussions are beginning on creating standardised navboxes nationwide, we definitely need to have a meeting so I can explain how I use these boxes and how they best perform. [[User:Murphynw|Murphynw]] 18:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Hi Nathan, yes although this topic came up from a Suffolk perspective, we think the discussion needs to take in a wider application. I would be interested to hear/understand the importance of having the parish links in the county Navbox. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 18:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Second proposal - 2 == | == Second proposal - 2 == | ||
This must be a preliminary idea of how to use the navboxes. On the Suffolk pages I have inserted it right into the Civil registration section [[Bedfield, Suffolk#Resources]]. There is no need to link to topics since they are already incorporated into the parish page. Then I have a link to the [[Suffolk Civil Registration]] page. Then I have a link to the [[Hoxne Hundred, Suffolk]] of which I could have called the Hoxne Deanery or ''Hoxne hundred or Deanry'' page. [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 07:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | This must be a preliminary idea of how to use the navboxes. On the Suffolk pages I have inserted it right into the Civil registration section [[Bedfield, Suffolk#Resources]]. There is no need to link to topics since they are already incorporated into the parish page. Then I have a link to the [[Suffolk Civil Registration]] page. Then I have a link to the [[Hoxne Hundred, Suffolk]] of which I could have called the Hoxne Deanery or ''Hoxne hundred or Deanry'' page. [[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 07:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:24, 24 January 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject England/Navboxes page. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Scope[edit source]
I did not realize that the Community Council's scope was to alter the navboxes nationwide in England. From the message I received, I understood that it was limited to a decision about Suffolk. If discussions are beginning on creating standardised navboxes nationwide, we definitely need to have a meeting so I can explain how I use these boxes and how they best perform. Murphynw 18:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Nathan, yes although this topic came up from a Suffolk perspective, we think the discussion needs to take in a wider application. I would be interested to hear/understand the importance of having the parish links in the county Navbox. --Steve (talk| contribs) 18:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Second proposal - 2[edit source]
This must be a preliminary idea of how to use the navboxes. On the Suffolk pages I have inserted it right into the Civil registration section Bedfield, Suffolk. There is no need to link to topics since they are already incorporated into the parish page. Then I have a link to the Suffolk Civil Registration page. Then I have a link to the Hoxne Hundred, Suffolk of which I could have called the Hoxne Deanery or Hoxne hundred or Deanry page. Donjgen 07:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)