Template talk:Portal/US/State: Difference between revisions
(New page: I have removed the category using the pagename variable from this page. By using the page name variable for categorization, it will spam the category list by creating a category for every...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have removed the category using the pagename variable from this page. By using the page name variable for categorization, it will spam the category list by creating a category for every page using the template. Please see our guidelines at [[How to categorize an article]]. [[User:Molliewog|Molliewog]] 14:28, 11 March 2008 (MDT) | I have removed the category using the pagename variable from this page. By using the page name variable for categorization, it will spam the category list by creating a category for every page using the template. Please see our guidelines at [[How to categorize an article]]. [[User:Molliewog|Molliewog]] 14:28, 11 March 2008 (MDT) | ||
:: Good plan!. The category worked b/c New York was a category, but probably would not have worked. I have removed the direct article link too, since that was 'magic' for New York. If we had a good naming system for these, we could add them back in, possibly with some regex to make them more readable. Thanks [[User:The Earl|The Earl]] 14:37, 11 March 2008 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:37, 11 March 2008
I have removed the category using the pagename variable from this page. By using the page name variable for categorization, it will spam the category list by creating a category for every page using the template. Please see our guidelines at How to categorize an article. Molliewog 14:28, 11 March 2008 (MDT)
- Good plan!. The category worked b/c New York was a category, but probably would not have worked. I have removed the direct article link too, since that was 'magic' for New York. If we had a good naming system for these, we could add them back in, possibly with some regex to make them more readable. Thanks The Earl 14:37, 11 March 2008 (MDT)