Jump to content

FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProject Utah Tasks Newspapers: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(added ref link for discussion)
mNo edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


Utah co - This county already has a separate Utah County Newspaper page. Yikes--we so haven't covered this issue! See county page and separate Utah co. newsaper page and talk page for how I attempted to handle it<br>  
Utah co - This county already has a separate Utah County Newspaper page. Yikes--we so haven't covered this issue! See county page and separate Utah co. newsaper page and talk page for how I attempted to handle it<br>  
&nbsp;&nbsp; see [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Utah_County,_Utah Utah county page] and [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Utah_County,_Utah Utah county Newspaper page]


<u>'''Blips Jana and Liz ran into, but are resolving a standard practice for:'''</u>  
<u>'''Blips Jana and Liz ran into, but are resolving a standard practice for:'''</u>  
Line 41: Line 43:
Jana: finding I tend to put present day newspaper website links that are already on page...at bottom of newspaper template; not that we are really listing things chronologically<br>  
Jana: finding I tend to put present day newspaper website links that are already on page...at bottom of newspaper template; not that we are really listing things chronologically<br>  


Liz Snow:&nbsp;I've been looking at the newspaper task and it doesn't say to add the current newspapers to the newspaper list. So, either we need to talk to Wilma and see if she wants to change the task to include that, or not.<br>
Liz Snow:&nbsp;I've been looking at the newspaper task and it doesn't say to add the current newspapers to the newspaper list. So, either we need to talk to Wilma and see if she wants to change the task to include that, or not.<br>  


No Utah Digital sources for Washinton co; but left template in w/ indented bullet "none at present time"; thought might be better than removing altogether??...we did opposite w/ FHL cat template--since there were no links we didn't put in...guess I thought might be greater probabliity that Utah Digit. might soon get a source whereas FHL not so likely..true thought?<br>  
No Utah Digital sources for Washinton co; but left template in w/ indented bullet "none at present time"; thought might be better than removing altogether??...we did opposite w/ FHL cat template--since there were no links we didn't put in...guess I thought might be greater probabliity that Utah Digit. might soon get a source whereas FHL not so likely..true thought?<br>  


[[User:JanaStokes|JanaStokes]] 16:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)<br>
[[User:JanaStokes|JanaStokes]] 16:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)<br>  
 


<br>


I am not sure what the best thing to do for this problem. It sounds logical to leave the bullet there, but I guess we can ask for more opinions.&nbsp;&nbsp; ---Liz Snow<br>
I am not sure what the best thing to do for this problem. It sounds logical to leave the bullet there, but I guess we can ask for more opinions.&nbsp;&nbsp; ---Liz Snow<br>
'''<u></u>'''<u>'''Discussion need to happen in weekly project meeting about transition protocol between newspaper template on county page and an existing newspaper county page:'''</u>
&nbsp;&nbsp; see [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Utah_County,_Utah Utah county page] and [https://www.familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Utah_County,_Utah Utah county Newspaper page]
2,909

edits