Jump to content

New York Probate Records: Difference between revisions

ref repair
(Hoff New England)
(ref repair)
Line 34: Line 34:
Many wills were recorded in deed books—particularly in English settlements in New Netherland, such as Gravesend and the eastern towns of Long Island outside Dutch jurisdiction. When the English took over, probates were initially under the jurisdiction of either the court of assizes or the courts of session. By 1686, the governor's prerogative court centralized the recording of probates. In the colonial era, the prerogative court usually probated wills and administrations. The governor, who functioned as the "ordinary" or "surrogate general," had the authority to probate estates. Because the governor could not personally oversee probates, he appointed local surrogates to act in his behalf.  
Many wills were recorded in deed books—particularly in English settlements in New Netherland, such as Gravesend and the eastern towns of Long Island outside Dutch jurisdiction. When the English took over, probates were initially under the jurisdiction of either the court of assizes or the courts of session. By 1686, the governor's prerogative court centralized the recording of probates. In the colonial era, the prerogative court usually probated wills and administrations. The governor, who functioned as the "ordinary" or "surrogate general," had the authority to probate estates. Because the governor could not personally oversee probates, he appointed local surrogates to act in his behalf.  


Hoff published a list of New York probates recorded in Massachusetts in 1688-1689.</ref>Henry B. Hoff, "New York Probates Recorded in Massachusetts, 1688-1689, During the Dominion of New England," ''The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record,'' Vol. 139, No. 4 (Oct. 2008):266-268. Digital version at [http://www.newyorkfamilyhistory.org/public-elibrary New York Family History] ($); {{FHL|1181533|item|disp=FHL Book 974.7 B2n v. 139}}.</ref>
Hoff published a list of New York probates recorded in Massachusetts in 1688-1689.<ref>Henry B. Hoff, "New York Probates Recorded in Massachusetts, 1688-1689, During the Dominion of New England," ''The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record,'' Vol. 139, No. 4 (Oct. 2008):266-268. Digital version at [http://www.newyorkfamilyhistory.org/public-elibrary New York Family History] ($); {{FHL|1181533|item|disp=FHL Book 974.7 B2n v. 139}}.</ref>


In 1691, city and county courts of common pleas also began handling probate matters. Courts of common pleas began handling probates in each county, with the exception that estates in the southern district (Orange, Richmond, Westchester, and Kings counties) were proved in New York County. (The Orange County Court of Common Pleas was allowed in 1750 to rule on probates.) Wills from Suffolk and Queens counties were also filed in New York. All these records later came into the custody of the New York County Surrogate's Court. Before 1787, some wills were also recorded in county and town records.  
In 1691, city and county courts of common pleas also began handling probate matters. Courts of common pleas began handling probates in each county, with the exception that estates in the southern district (Orange, Richmond, Westchester, and Kings counties) were proved in New York County. (The Orange County Court of Common Pleas was allowed in 1750 to rule on probates.) Wills from Suffolk and Queens counties were also filed in New York. All these records later came into the custody of the New York County Surrogate's Court. Before 1787, some wills were also recorded in county and town records.  
407,336

edits