Template talk:FamilySearch Collection: Difference between revisions

typo
(proposed wording change)
(typo)
Line 21: Line 21:
So I went ahead and changed the logo. I did not change the link name as I would prefer the link works. i am going to, in the near future perhaps move the FamilySearch Record Search article to a new name. Something like "FamilySearch Collections" same article new title.  
So I went ahead and changed the logo. I did not change the link name as I would prefer the link works. i am going to, in the near future perhaps move the FamilySearch Record Search article to a new name. Something like "FamilySearch Collections" same article new title.  


== Wording<br> ==
== Wording<br> ==


I would suggest that the words "for free online" be removed from the template.&nbsp;I'm concerned the word "free" it may be misleading. There are "free index/for-pay image" collections and "free index/free image" collections. The template doesn't differentiate.&nbsp; The wording must either differentiate (and be absolutely accurate)&nbsp;or the word "free" should be removed.&nbsp; Also, stating that a collection is available at FamilySearch.org (a website) provides sufficient clarity so that people understand it's available online. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)<br>
I would suggest that the words "for free online" be removed from the template.&nbsp;I'm concerned the word "free" may be misleading. There are "free index/for-pay image" collections and "free index/free image" collections. The template doesn't differentiate.&nbsp; The wording must either differentiate (and be absolutely accurate)&nbsp;or the word "free" should be removed.&nbsp; Also, stating that a collection is available at FamilySearch.org (a website) provides sufficient clarity so that people understand it's available online. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)<br>  


<br>
<br>
3,911

edits