13,601
edits
(a pox on the display of WorldCat items numbers) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:I have avoided this template precisely because it traditionally displayed what I believed was a long, boring, meaningless-to-readers, and confusing number. So what I did instead was create an external link to the WorldCat page where I could control what the readers saw--and I made sure they were '''not''' seeing that number. I have added about 150 links to WorldCat and NEVER used the template because I so viscerally dislike showing the number. Thank you for fixing it so we can now control what the readers see by using disp= parameter. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 18:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | :I have avoided this template precisely because it traditionally displayed what I believed was a long, boring, meaningless-to-readers, and confusing number. So what I did instead was create an external link to the WorldCat page where I could control what the readers saw--and I made sure they were '''not''' seeing that number. I have added about 150 links to WorldCat and NEVER used the template because I so viscerally dislike showing the number. Thank you for fixing it so we can now control what the readers see by using disp= parameter. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 18:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
I love the new template with the disp=. We appreciate you so much and the speed that you assist us. [[User:Dianekay|Dianekay]] 18:45, 6 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Request we replace the default display of WorldCat item numbers == | == Request we replace the default display of WorldCat item numbers == |
edits