Jump to content

FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Utah Hows: Difference between revisions

include or not section
No edit summary
(include or not section)
Line 112: Line 112:
*Does it link to other useful sites?<br><br>
*Does it link to other useful sites?<br><br>
*Does it give strategies, methods, or tips for doing research?<br><br>
*Does it give strategies, methods, or tips for doing research?<br><br>
*It is an unusual yet valuable resource? Might it spur ideas for finding such resources for other places?<br><br>
*Does it <br><br>
*Does it <br><br>
*Does everyone already know about it?
*Does everyone already know about it? <br><br>
*Can the link go exact place for that locality, or will the user need to be told how to find the information after following the link?
*Does your link go to the exact place on the site for that locality, or will the user need to be told how to find the information after clicking? <br><br>
*How hard was it to find the link? Is it worth describing how to find it? Is it easily found (your decision) or obscure (include it)?<br><br>
*How hard was it to find the link? Is it worth describing how to find it? Is it easily found (your decision) or obscure (include it)?<br><br>
*Value added – Does it add value or simply duplicate information from other sites?  
*Value added – Does it add value or simply duplicate information from other sites?  
**Example: Beaver County Death Records for 1904 duplicates information given in the State death certificates online. The value added is the focus on Beaver County deaths for that year.
**Example: Beaver County Death Records for 1904 duplicates information given in the Statewide death certificates online. The value added is the focus on Beaver County deaths for that year.
*How many other links are already under this topic heading? (Avoid cluttering the Wiki.)  
*How many other links are already under this topic heading? (Avoid cluttering the Wiki.)  
**What is the relative importance of this link, as compared to others under the same topic heading?
** Try to put those of most value high on the list.
***Try to put those of most value high on the list.  
**Relative importance (coverage, size, completeness).  
***Put smaller # entries lower on the list.<br><br>
***'''Coverage.'''
*It is an unusual resource? Might it spur ideas for finding such resources for other places?<br><br>
****Who is included and who is excluded? On this site, did they take a subsection of the record or include everyone in the record? In military records, for example, did they only take men from a certain town, those above age 45, or only those who were Methodists? (Patsy -- do we need the&nbsp;% of the target population still. (Is that an aspect of the records themselves or of this site?)
****Does it focus on a group? Church, minority, ethinic, occupational groups, for example.
***'''Size.''' Will a small number of entries give enough value to merit the effort of creating the link? In a place with low population? In a place with high population?
****What percentage of the target population does it include for this place/topic?  
****What if some cemeteries only have 3 "residents." Possible solution: link to the section on that site that links to several cemeteries, rather than linking from the Wiki to individual cemeteries.<br><br>
***'''Completeness.'''
****How complete is the information? (Full transcription (preferred) or piece-meal submissions by families (your decision)




'''Placement:''' Consider if this should be at the top or the bottom of the list, in relation to other items already under that resource topic:
<br><br>


*Relative importance (coverage, size, completeness).
**'''Coverage.'''
***Who is included and who is excluded? On this site, did they take a subsection of the record or include everyone in the record? In military records, for example, did they only take men from a certain town, those above age 45, or only those who were Methodists? (Patsy -- do we need the % of the target population still. (Is that an aspect of the records themselves or of this site?)
*Does it focus on a group? Church, minority, ethinic, occupational groups, for example.<br><br>
***What percentage of the target population does it include for this place/topic? For example, what percentage of deaths
<br>
**Size – will a small number of entries give enough value to merit the effort of creating the link? In a place with low population? In a place with high population?
**What if some cemeteries only have 3 "residents." Possible solution: link to the section on that site for cemeteries, rather than to individual cemeteries.<br><br>
**How complete is the information? (Full transcription (preferred) or piece-meal submissions by families (your decision)
<br>Description


<br>
<br>
Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825

edits