FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Utah Hows: Difference between revisions

rewording for include/exclude a link
(updating ideas)
(rewording for include/exclude a link)
Line 104: Line 104:
The following comments are to help you decide whether to add a particular link or not. Consider the ''value'' to the Wiki user.<br>
The following comments are to help you decide whether to add a particular link or not. Consider the ''value'' to the Wiki user.<br>


'''Value to the Wiki user:''' These questions may help you determine to include a link or not:  
'''Value to the Wiki user''' These questions may help you determine to include a link or not:  


*If this were where your ancestors lived, would you want the link?<br><br>
*If this were where your ancestors lived, would you want the link?<br><br>
*Will it help most users for that place or topic, or only a few?  
*Will it help most users for that place or topic, or only a few?<br><br>
**Completeness – Do the entries appear to be a complete transcription (preferred) or piece-meal submissions by families (depends on value)? ercentage of the population of that place.
*Does it index a set of records? <br><br>
**Coverage – Who is included and who is excluded?
*Does it include record images?<br><br>
***Males only or also females?
*Does it link to other useful sites?<br><br>
***What percentage of the target population does it include for this place/topic? For example, what percentage of deaths  
*Does it give strategies, methods, or tips for doing research?<br><br>
*Does it
 
Placement: Consider if this should be at the top or the bottom of the list, in relation to other items already under that resource topic:
*Relative importance (coverage, size, completeness). (WA link to each of these)
 
 
**How complete is the information? (Full transcription (preferred) or piece-meal submissions by families (your decision)
 
 
Description
**Who is included and who is excluded? In military records, for example, males are included far more often than females. On this site, did they take a subsection of the record or include everyone in the record? Carrying the example further, did they only take men from a certain town, those above age 45, or those who were Methodists?
***Males only or also females?  
***What percentage of the target population does it include for this place/topic? For example, what percentage of deaths
**Size – will a small number of entries give enough value to merit the effort of creating the link? In a place with low population? In a place with high population?  
**Size – will a small number of entries give enough value to merit the effort of creating the link? In a place with low population? In a place with high population?  
**What if some cemeteries only have 3 "residents." Possible solution: link to the section on that site for cemeteries, rather than to individual cemeteries.<br><br>
**What if some cemeteries only have 3 "residents." Possible solution: link to the section on that site for cemeteries, rather than to individual cemeteries.<br><br>
Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825

edits