|
|
| Line 121: |
Line 121: |
| *It is an unusual resource? Might it spur ideas for finding such resources for other places?<br><br> | | *It is an unusual resource? Might it spur ideas for finding such resources for other places?<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| *Focus on a group? Church, minority, ethinic, occupational groups, for example.<br><br> | | *Does it focus on a group? Church, minority, ethinic, occupational groups, for example.<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| <br> | | <br> |
|
| |
| '''Locality or Subject'''
| |
|
| |
| Consider the place (population, remoteness, importance in history, migration, etc.) Consider the time period
| |
|
| |
| '''The Website'''
| |
|
| |
| *It should contain no inappropriate words or images. (WA: Link to where this is explained in the Wiki)
| |
| *If most of the content is piece-meal submissions, perhaps we can tell people to search for more information at that site, rather than create links to small databases. Should it caution them not to get too excited?
| |
|
| |
| If the county has a lot of resources, we would not do one with only 3. Guidelines: time of making the link, value to the user, importance in relation to other sources. You make the choice, but explain to the user. This item led to a discussion about how many entries a record needed to have before it should be added to wiki. Many times GenWeb has only a few images someone has entered for their family. Should everything there be noted? We determined that the number would vary accorsing to: or was it misleading, making someone believe there was more info available than there was?
| |
|
| |
|
| === How to create a link === | | === How to create a link === |