Jump to content

FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Utah Hows: Difference between revisions

adding to add a link or not
(writing the include a link or not piece)
(adding to add a link or not)
Line 89: Line 89:
=== Guidelines for Including Links (or Not)  ===
=== Guidelines for Including Links (or Not)  ===


The following suggestions are to help you decide whether to add a particular link or not, such as a link to a very small database.
The purpose of the FamilySearch Wiki is to help users by giving them knowledge about records and methods for genealogy and family history.


Consider the place (population, remoteness, importance in history, migration, etc.)
It is NOT the Wiki's purpose to point to every specific website or publication that exists. Such a list would be overwhelming, for one thing, and would clutter the Wiki to the point that the important and relevant items would be buried, rather than highlighted.
Consider the time period (
Constraints: We don't just want the Wiki full of clutter.
Selective enough -- but not everything. Perhaps we can tell people to search for more at that site, or caution them.


Value to the user:
The following suggestions are to help you decide whether to add a particular link or not. Considerations include the locality or subject, the site, and the value to the user.
*Number of links already under this topic heading. (Avoid cluttering the Wiki.)
 
*Relative importance of this link, as compared to others under the same topic heading.
'''Locality or Subject'''
*Size of a database. A database of 3 entries is probably too small to include, even in a county with low population. Some cemeteries, however, only have 3 entries. Solution: link to the section on that site for cemeteries, rather than to individual cemeteries.
 
Consider the place (population, remoteness, importance in history, migration, etc.) Consider the time period ( Constraints: We don't just want the Wiki full of clutter. Selective enough -- but not everything. Perhaps we can tell people to search for more at that site, or caution them.
 
'''The Website Itself'''
 
 
'''Value to the user:'''
 
*Number of links already under this topic heading. (Avoid cluttering the Wiki.)  
*Relative importance of this link, as compared to others under the same topic heading.  
*Size of a database. A database of 3 entries is probably too small to include, even in a county with low population. Some cemeteries, however, only have 3 entries. Solution: link to the section on that site for cemeteries, rather than to individual cemeteries.  
*Uniqueness of the information. Does it simply duplicate information from other sites, or does it add value?  
*Uniqueness of the information. Does it simply duplicate information from other sites, or does it add value?  
**Example: Beaver County Death Records for 1904 duplicates information given in the State death certificates online. The value added is the focus on Beaver County deaths for that year.
**Example: Beaver County Death Records for 1904 duplicates information given in the State death certificates online. The value added is the focus on Beaver County deaths for that year.
*How good was the coverage?
*How good was the coverage?  
*Is it worth your time to add the link?
*Is it worth your time to add the link?  
*If a record with few entries was listed, it should appear lower on the list  
*If a record with few entries was listed, it should appear lower on the list


If the county has a lot of resources, we would not do one with only 3. Guidelines: time of making the link, value to the user, importance in relation to other sources. You make the choice, but explain to the user.  
If the county has a lot of resources, we would not do one with only 3. Guidelines: time of making the link, value to the user, importance in relation to other sources. You make the choice, but explain to the user. This item led to a discussion about how many entries a record needed to have before it should be added to wiki. Many times GenWeb has only a few images someone has entered for their family. Should everything there be noted? We determined that the number would vary accorsing to: or was it misleading, making someone believe there was more info available than there was?
This item led to a discussion about how many entries a record needed to have before it should be added to wiki. Many times GenWeb has only a few images someone has entered for their family. Should everything there be noted? We determined that the number would vary accorsing to:  
or was it misleading, making someone believe there was more info available than there was?


=== How to create a link  ===
=== How to create a link  ===
Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825

edits