90,866
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Navboxes: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Navboxes (view source)
Revision as of 09:23, 12 October 2010
, 12 October 2010→Group title position: add opinion
(→Nested vs. not: add opinion) |
(→Group title position: add opinion) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
On my computer, in the example above, using smaller font and left-side group titles results in 11 lines of navbox text versus the 19 lines of navbox text when larger font and top-bar group names are used. What is the difference on your computer? | On my computer, in the example above, using smaller font and left-side group titles results in 11 lines of navbox text versus the 19 lines of navbox text when larger font and top-bar group names are used. What is the difference on your computer? | ||
It is my hope the MoS will prefer shorter, rather than longer navboxes. I would like a MoS that allows a variety of navbox styles including both shown above, but suggesting that normally a shorter navbox is the better choice. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 17:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | It is my hope the MoS will prefer shorter, rather than longer navboxes. I would like a MoS that allows a variety of navbox styles including both shown above, but suggesting that normally a shorter navbox is the better choice. [[User:DiltsGD|DiltsGD]] 17:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Again I think the guideline should allow for both options. I agree that the guidelines should favour shorter navboxes than longer. I would hope that group titles list to the left of the link are kept short, using abbreviations if necessary to keep the left hand column as narrow as possible. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 16:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
=== Font size === | === Font size === | ||