Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=NO USER GROUP TODAY!!!= | = NO USER GROUP TODAY!!! = | ||
__TOC__ | The staff is involved in meetings. | ||
__TOC__ | |||
== Be bold! Post your agenda items! == | == Be bold! Post your agenda items! == | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
=== Information items === | === Information items === | ||
====Editing Problems==== | ==== Editing Problems ==== | ||
Potential editing problems as reported by some Research Support Missionaries. [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 17:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Potential editing problems as reported by some Research Support Missionaries. [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 17:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
==== Place Template ==== | ==== Place Template ==== | ||
Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
However this create a problem involving the Indians. Can't have "Indians of New York", has to be "New York Indians" to be included in the Place Template listing. The key is the first part of the url. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 16:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | However this create a problem involving the Indians. Can't have "Indians of New York", has to be "New York Indians" to be included in the Place Template listing. The key is the first part of the url. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 16:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
I already brought up the problem of 3 different names for the Indians of North America. Asked the workgroup doing the Indians to decide on one. American Indians? Native Races? Native Americans? I rather it be decided by the workgroup doing the Indians. This is necessary in order to be steamlined within the Place Template. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 17:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | I already brought up the problem of 3 different names for the Indians of North America. Asked the workgroup doing the Indians to decide on one. American Indians? Native Races? Native Americans? I rather it be decided by the workgroup doing the Indians. This is necessary in order to be steamlined within the Place Template. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 17:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I have started a discussion of this issue in the [[Template talk:Place# | :I have started a discussion of this issue in the [[Template talk:Place#Topics_that_use_a_different_naming_style|template talk page]]. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 20:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Sorry! I neglected to mention HOW to write it. | Sorry! I neglected to mention HOW to write it. Place|<place name> [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 17:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
==== Category recategorizing ==== | ==== Category recategorizing ==== | ||
Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
Due to a pesky category problem, Steve Cottrell came up with better way to display list of topics in categories. See New York's category (sorry I can't link this one or it shift to bottom!). [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 16:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | Due to a pesky category problem, Steve Cottrell came up with better way to display list of topics in categories. See New York's category (sorry I can't link this one or it shift to bottom!). [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 16:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
: Here is a link to the category [[:Category:New York]] --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 19:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | :Here is a link to the category [[:Category:New York]] --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 19:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Sorry! I neglected to mention HOW to do it.. | Sorry! I neglected to mention HOW to do it.. Category:<place name>|topic and it has to match the last part of url. It can not be listed Naturalization when it shows Naturalization and Citizenship in the url so the category has to be Category:<place name>|Naturalization and Citizenship. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 17:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
: The text after a category pipe does not have to match the last part of the URL but it makes sense if if does. For a full explanation about category sorting see {{Wpd|Wikipedia:Categorization#Using_sort_keys}} --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 19:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | :The text after a category pipe does not have to match the last part of the URL but it makes sense if if does. For a full explanation about category sorting see {{Wpd|Wikipedia:Categorization#Using_sort_keys}} --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 19:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
=== Discussion items === | === Discussion items === | ||
Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
==== Carryover from Last Week ==== | ==== Carryover from Last Week ==== | ||
Idea for interim change to home page above "find articles by country" put "find articles by topic ... glossary, beginners, table of contents, about wiki, etc.... [[User:Brycefifield|BryceFifield]]<br> | Idea for interim change to home page above "find articles by country" put "find articles by topic ... glossary, beginners, table of contents, about wiki, etc.... [[User:Brycefifield|BryceFifield]]<br> | ||
==== New Items ==== | ==== New Items ==== | ||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
Gregory Bean's comment under #1 on [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Wiki_talk:Site_Design_Ideas FamilySearch Wiki Talk:Site Design] [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Wiki_talk:Site_Design_Ideas FamilySearch_Wiki User_Group] [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 17:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | Gregory Bean's comment under #1 on [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Wiki_talk:Site_Design_Ideas FamilySearch Wiki Talk:Site Design] [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/FamilySearch_Wiki_talk:Site_Design_Ideas FamilySearch_Wiki User_Group] [[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 17:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Input on content of Glossary (see ---- | Input on content of Glossary (see ---- [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/A_genealogical_glossary_terms A genealogical glossary terms] ----for example of how it looks with content from FamilySearch glossary with foreign words -- note that formatting is still a work in progress). Is it unwieldy? Are there too many entries to be useful? Should foreign words be moved to a different part of glossary? Who else ought to give feedback? [[User:Brycefifield|BryceFifield]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Category:Categories to be determined]] |