9,422
edits
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
A copyholder was a farmer, who | A copyholder was a farmer or cottager, who leased his land from an [[Danish Gods| estate]], an institution, the crown, or before 1536, the church. The condition of the contract became binding, when the entrace fee was paid. If the copyholder honored the conditions in the contract, the landowner could not cancel the copyhold during the lifespan of the farmer and his widow. | ||
===Condition of ownership=== | ===Condition of ownership=== | ||
Conditions of the copyhold were regulated by extensive laws. The landowner therefore did not have free range make decisions regarding the taxable farm land. The government wanted to avoid unproductive farms. Therefore the landowner was required to find a new copyholder, when the farmer (or his widow) died. Only in case of unusual circumstances could the landowner receive permission to abolish a copyhold. | Conditions of the copyhold were regulated by extensive laws. The landowner therefore did not have free range make decisions regarding the taxable farm land. The government wanted to avoid unproductive farms. Therefore the landowner was required to find a new copyholder, when the farmer (or his widow) died. Only in case of unusual circumstances could the landowner receive permission to abolish a copyhold. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
Depending on the size of the copyhold farm the copyholder had various titles: | Depending on the size of the copyhold farm the copyholder had various titles: | ||
* | *Gårdmand (Farmer) if the farm production consisted of 3-11 units of hartkorn (A Danish unit of land valuation) | ||
* | *Boelsmand (Copyholder) if the farm production was less than 3 units of hartkorn. | ||
* | *Husmand (Cottage-copyholder) if the farm production was less than 1 unit of hartkorn. | ||
===Copyholders | ===Copyholders Dues === | ||
The copyholder | The copyholder paid annual dues to the lord and performed corvee labor on the lord's demesne farms. The annual dues were clearly define in the contract and remained constant year after year. The corvee labor, on the other hand, was unspecified and the lord could demand as much of this has he desired until labor laws were passed in the 1790's that limited this right. The copyholders also paid 10% tithing and an additional 1/90 was given to the local clerk (degn) so that 1/9 of all his income went to the church. Finally, the copyholder was also required to pay taxes (cash) to the crown. If a copyholder could not pay the required taxes, then the landed proprietor had to pay on his behalf, and be repaid when the copyholder was able to pay. The taxes owed to the crown were much higher than the rents owed to the lord and many peasants struggled to make these payments. Palle Ove Christiansen found that by careful administration, a well managed estate could reasonably collect about 80% of the taxes owed. | ||
===Copyholders | ===Copyholders Personal Rights=== | ||
In countries with serfdom the landowner had a certain ownership of the farmers | In countries with serfdom the landowner had a certain ownership of the farmers (This applied in Russia until 1861). Serfdom did not exist as such in Denmark. Here the farmers in principle had personal freedom. The freedom was however limited. | ||
Until 1702, a law called Vornedskab was in effect on the islands of Zealand, Lolland, Falster, Møn, and Bogø until 1702. This law required peasants to remain on the estate of their birth and the lord could force them to take over farm. In 1733, [[Denmark: Adscription of 1733 (Stavnsbåndet)|Adscription (Stavnsbåndet)]] was established throughout the country. Adscription meant that certain age groups of men and boys could not move away from their estate and was officially established so that the landed proprietors would have available copyholders to occupy vacant copy farms, and also for the purpose of providing a sufficient number of soldiers for the military. <br> <br> | |||
Adscription did not mean much to the copyholder. He seldom had any interest in leaving his farm. In contrast, the adscription gave the landed proprietor and the bailiff great power over the unmarried copyholder sons. Landed proprietors could enroll the copyholder sons to be soldiers or force them to take over a neglected copy farm. <br> <br> | |||
Initially, the landed proprietor had large influence on the administration of justice. Either because he was the judge, or because the judicial district judge or the district-bailiff were dependent upon the landed proprietor. The larger law cases could be appealed to independent judgment seats. | Initially, the landed proprietor had large influence on the administration of justice. Either because he was the judge, or because the judicial district judge or the district-bailiff were dependent upon the landed proprietor. The larger law cases could be appealed to independent judgment seats. <br> <br> | ||
The landed proprietors power in everyday life was limited because the villages were self governing, and because the copyholder was the head of his household. | The landed proprietors power in everyday life was limited because the villages were self governing, and because the copyholder was the head of his household. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 39: | ||
===Copyhold=== | ===Copyhold=== | ||
When a copyhold farm was vacant, it was often taken over by a son or son-in-law of the original copyholder. | When a copyhold farm was vacant, it was often taken over by a son or son-in-law of the original copyholder. The lord could however decide to give the farm to a stranger. | ||
===The origin of the copyhold system=== | ===The origin of the copyhold system=== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 49: | ||
===Elimination of copyhold system=== | ===Elimination of copyhold system=== | ||
The dissolution of adscription in 1788 was the first step to establish independent ownership as the common ownership format in farming. The development happened at different pace throughout the country. Elimination of the copyhold system was hindered by the Napoleonic Wars and the farm crisis in the 1820’s. | The dissolution of adscription in 1788 was the first step to establish independent ownership as the common ownership format in farming. The development happened at different pace throughout the country. Elimination of the copyhold system was hindered by the Napoleonic Wars and the farm crisis in the 1820’s. <br> <br> | ||
In the 1840’s, 5 out of 6 of farmers in Holbæk County were still copyholders. The demand for elimination of the copyhold system was raised politically by Friends of Farmers. | In the 1840’s, 5 out of 6 of farmers in Holbæk County were still copyholders. The demand for elimination of the copyhold system was raised politically by Friends of Farmers. <br> <br> | ||
The party was unsuccessful in getting their demands into the Constitution of 1849. In contrast, a law was established in the 1850’s which enabled the landed proprietors to voluntarily sell their copyhold farms. For every 9 copyhold farms that a landed proprietor sold, he could claim the 10th farm directly as part of his estate. | The party was unsuccessful in getting their demands into the Constitution of 1849. In contrast, a law was established in the 1850’s which enabled the landed proprietors to voluntarily sell their copyhold farms. For every 9 copyhold farms that a landed proprietor sold, he could claim the 10th farm directly as part of his estate. <br> <br> | ||
Even though the development was slow, the copyholders succeeded on the smaller estates to become independent. On the larger estates (counts and lords), nothing happened until after the First World War. | Even though the development was slow, the copyholders succeeded on the smaller estates to become independent. On the larger estates (counts and lords), nothing happened until after the First World War. <br> <br> | ||
In 1919 Parliament established a law regarding elimination of counts and lords. In 1922 the Supreme Court ruled the counts and lords as it were in the case of the smaller landed proprietors, without charge, could keep every 10th of the prior copyhold farms. This became law in 1925, and the old copyhold system disappeared. | In 1919 Parliament established a law regarding elimination of counts and lords. In 1922 the Supreme Court ruled the counts and lords as it were in the case of the smaller landed proprietors, without charge, could keep every 10th of the prior copyhold farms. This became law in 1925, and the old copyhold system disappeared. | ||