Jump to content

Template talk:FamilySearch Collection: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(→‎Other Discussion: no worries)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
== Other Discussion  ==
== Other Discussion  ==


Steve, Sorry about the unintentional save. I was looking at this template as an example while I worked on another template. I got a 2 minute warning, and thought it was for the other template. I panicked, threw in a comment, and saved. I tried an undo but it didn't seem to work. I hope the changes are just formatting? [[User:RaymondRS|Robert]] 17:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Steve, Sorry about the unintentional save. I was looking at this template as an example while I worked on another template. I got a 2 minute warning, and thought it was for the other template. I panicked, threw in a comment, and saved. I tried an undo but it didn't seem to work. I hope the changes are just formatting? [[User:RaymondRS|Robert]] 17:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)  
 


:No worries. Looking at the [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/index.php?title=Template:Record_Search_article&diff=292493&oldid=277716 diff] all that has happened is that the FCKeditor has changed the first style attribute into a more verbose version. The result is the same. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 17:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
:No worries. Looking at the [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/index.php?title=Template:Record_Search_article&diff=292493&oldid=277716 diff] all that has happened is that the FCKeditor has changed the first style attribute into a more verbose version. The result is the same. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 17:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
== Eliminating "Record Search" ==
So it seems that the name "Record Search" is no longer going to be used. So is it possible to remove that phrase from this template? I am thinking for the logo just using the FamilySearch part as well as just using FamilySearch.
1,533

edits