90,866
edits
Template talk:BaltFire: Difference between revisions
→Testing results
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
I added another example of how it is possible to do this, but using {{tl|Wpd}} completely (it is missing source citation information). I noticed that the reference that they created is pointing to an archive version of the article. I am not sure why this might be and it does not seem like a good idea without using what should be the permalink. If you look at the the "Coded by hand" example has multiple "amp;" following the '&' character. This shows what happens when switching in and out of Wikitext & WYSIWYG (or the other way around) . . . only when the '&' is within a <nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki> pair. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 17:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | I added another example of how it is possible to do this, but using {{tl|Wpd}} completely (it is missing source citation information). I noticed that the reference that they created is pointing to an archive version of the article. I am not sure why this might be and it does not seem like a good idea without using what should be the permalink. If you look at the the "Coded by hand" example has multiple "amp;" following the '&' character. This shows what happens when switching in and out of Wikitext & WYSIWYG (or the other way around) . . . only when the '&' is within a <nowiki><ref> </ref></nowiki> pair. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 17:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:If you view the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&page=Great_Baltimore_Fire&id=269520358 cite this page link] from the article you will see that David Dilts is using the Chicago style. That being the case I do not think the example ''using the Wpd template'' is good enough for a full bibliographic citation. What has happened to ''code by hand'' example shows that the problem is still existing but only when the rich text editor is used. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 17:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC) | |||