|
|
| Line 133: |
Line 133: |
| When a page is moved, a redirect is automatically left behind. Administrators have the ability to suppress the redirect, i.e., to prevent it being created, by unchecking the box labelled "Leave a redirect behind." This is useful to save time when performing moves for which a redirect is inappropriate, such as reverting page move vandalism. | | When a page is moved, a redirect is automatically left behind. Administrators have the ability to suppress the redirect, i.e., to prevent it being created, by unchecking the box labelled "Leave a redirect behind." This is useful to save time when performing moves for which a redirect is inappropriate, such as reverting page move vandalism. |
|
| |
|
| However, in general, unless there is a good reason (such as vandalism or [[FamilySearch Wiki:Userfication|userfying]] ''recently created'' malplaced items) to suppress the redirect, it is best to leave it behind, as a useful entry in the history. This leaves a trail to help readers find the old article, in case a new article is created at its previous location, and to prevent [[FamilySearch Wiki:Linkrot|linkrot]]. | | However, in general, unless there is a good reason (such as vandalism or userfying ''recently created'' malplaced items) to suppress the redirect, it is best to leave it behind, as a useful entry in the history. This leaves a trail to help readers find the old article, in case a new article is created at its previous location, and to prevent [[FamilySearch Wiki:Linkrot|linkrot]]. |
| Therefore, usually we don't suppress nor [[FamilySearch Wiki:Redirects#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect.3F|delete]] redirects. As Brion Vibber [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842#c20 said], "Not breaking links helps everyone, ''especially us first and foremost''". He also [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842#c15 described] the removal of (file) redirects as "extremely user-hostile and makes the project less useful". | | Therefore, usually we don't suppress nor [[FamilySearch Wiki:Redirects#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect.3F|delete]] redirects. As Brion Vibber [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842#c20 said], "Not breaking links helps everyone, ''especially us first and foremost''". He also [http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15842#c15 described] the removal of (file) redirects as "extremely user-hostile and makes the project less useful". |
|
| |
|