Fiji Land and Property: Difference between revisions

→‎Tips:: removed references to USA transactions
(→‎Finding Your Ancestor in the Record: removed references to USA land grants!)
(→‎Tips:: removed references to USA transactions)
Line 34: Line 34:
*The transaction might have been recorded at a much later date. This is especially true if the land remained in the family. Selling to a non-family member may have prompted the recording of the title decades after the initial owner died.  
*The transaction might have been recorded at a much later date. This is especially true if the land remained in the family. Selling to a non-family member may have prompted the recording of the title decades after the initial owner died.  
*Remember that land may be in a different jurisdictions (aka counties) in different years as county boundaries changed and new counties were formed.  
*Remember that land may be in a different jurisdictions (aka counties) in different years as county boundaries changed and new counties were formed.  
*Notice if there is a record of the person selling land but no record of the purchase. This can be a clue that 1) the land was acquired by inheritance, or 2) the land was acquired from the state or federal government (which means that a higher jurisdiction needs to be considered.)
*Plat each transaction. This may reveal additional acquisitions or divisions between transactions and identify mixed jurisdictions. It may also allow you to analyze what is happening to neighboring properties.
*Plat each transaction. This may reveal additional acquisitions or divisions between transactions and identify mixed jurisdictions. It may also allow you to analyze what is happening to neighboring properties.


5,437

edits