Jump to content

Row, Dunbartonshire, Scotland Genealogy: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Some of the records may also be indexed in several [https://familysearch.org/search/collection/location/1986318?region=Scotland FamilySearch collections] for Scotland." to "Some records may also be indexed in other [https://familysearc
m (Text replacement - "Some of the records may also be indexed in some [https://familysearch.org/search/collection/location/1986318?region=Scotland FamilySearch collections] for Scotland." to "Some of the records may also be indexed in several [https://fami)
m (Text replacement - "Some of the records may also be indexed in several [https://familysearch.org/search/collection/location/1986318?region=Scotland FamilySearch collections] for Scotland." to "Some records may also be indexed in other [https://familysearc)
Line 78: Line 78:
==== Condition of Original Registers—  ====
==== Condition of Original Registers—  ====


'''Index:''' For an index to these records, see [http://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/ Scotland’s People] website, a pay-for-view website. The Scottish Church Records Index is also still available at the [[Family History Library|Family History Library]] in Salt Lake City.  Some of the records may also be indexed in several [https://familysearch.org/search/collection/location/1986318?region=Scotland FamilySearch collections] for Scotland.  
'''Index:''' For an index to these records, see [http://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/ Scotland’s People] website, a pay-for-view website. The Scottish Church Records Index is also still available at the [[Family History Library|Family History Library]] in Salt Lake City.  Some records may also be indexed in other [https://familysearch.org/search/collection/location/1986318?region=Scotland FamilySearch collections] for Scotland.  


'''Births:''' A portion of the first leaf is lost, rendering about 17 entries are imperfect. Record seems to have been regularly kept.<br>'''Marriages:''' Record regularly kept.  
'''Births:''' A portion of the first leaf is lost, rendering about 17 entries are imperfect. Record seems to have been regularly kept.<br>'''Marriages:''' Record regularly kept.