3,970
edits
FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Feedback: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Feedback (view source)
Revision as of 21:56, 4 February 2015
, 4 February 2015added link
Luccagenes (talk | contribs) m (updates) |
Luccagenes (talk | contribs) m (added link) |
||
| Line 630: | Line 630: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" | | | align="left" | | ||
| align="left" | If professional genealogists are allowed to advertise their services then it should be mandatory that they have a track record of sharing (with the wiki) their knowledge and or experience at least on a quarterly basis or their "ads" should be removed. | | align="left" | If [[:Category:Professional Genealogists|professional genealogists]] are allowed to advertise their services then it should be mandatory that they have a track record of sharing (with the wiki) their knowledge and or experience at least on a quarterly basis or their "ads" should be removed. | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | | ||
| Line 655: | Line 655: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="left" | Professionals want to make money and not have their articles edited. If we publish we want credit for our work. | | align="left" | Professionals want to make money and not have their articles edited. If we publish we want credit for our work. | ||
| align="left" | <font color="green">Since the Research Wiki is about sharing knowledge, obviously they | | align="left" | <font color="green">Since the Research Wiki is about sharing knowledge, obviously they will not like the wiki. Creating an article using their own citations would get around the "credit" issue.</font> | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | | ||
| align="center" | | | align="center" | | ||