Template talk:WorldCat: Difference between revisions

→‎Editions: new section
(Add comment)
(→‎Editions: new section)
Line 30: Line 30:
::I followed the instructions and they failed, both with and withouth t1. Both failed ones linked to template rather than the OCLC record. I did try 3rd and it failed. I see Steve got it right somehow.
::I followed the instructions and they failed, both with and withouth t1. Both failed ones linked to template rather than the OCLC record. I did try 3rd and it failed. I see Steve got it right somehow.
:::DSammy, how about examples? The {{tl|tlx}} template would not be used when accessing templates, it is just used for displaying what a template looks like. All templates are case sensitive. The examples in the {{tl|WorldCat}} template were copied and pasted from what is displayed, so I do not know how they could have "failed" for you. Could you please provide examples? [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 16:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
:::DSammy, how about examples? The {{tl|tlx}} template would not be used when accessing templates, it is just used for displaying what a template looks like. All templates are case sensitive. The examples in the {{tl|WorldCat}} template were copied and pasted from what is displayed, so I do not know how they could have "failed" for you. Could you please provide examples? [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 16:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
== Editions ==
Currently unless {{{2}}} is either given as ''isbn'' or ''issn'' the word ''editions'' is added to the output URL. Is this the intended outcome? From the links given in the notes section, I assume not, but maybe they've not been updated. --[[User:CottrellS|Steve]] 18:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
90,866

edits