FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page: Difference between revisions

=== G Fröberg Morris ===

I appreciate Lermans insight and thoughts into this and agree with his comments. I'm not convinced the UnPortal really does help with search engine indexing. Given the sheer size of 2 million plus articles in the English Wikipedia and their heavy use of the Portal, they don't seem to be worried about Portal or UnPortal. As far as my experience, generally the Denmark and Sweden content comes up pretty quick using key words in a search engine. Maybe the general standardization of titles and formatting has helped. I do like the UnPortal in relation to ease of use. I'd like to suggest leaving the Portals as a Gate, and using UnPortals for SubPortal, or even individual article pages. <br>

 

 

 

 

If going un-portal drops links, please don't do it!&nbsp; It doesn't sound like there has been enough study or playing around with both ways to truly decide?&nbsp; Moriss' idea of leaving the Portals as a Gate and having things behind the gate go UnPortal or SubPortal, <u>'''''if it truly will insure they are picked up by search engines ,'''''</u>sounds like an excellent combination of the ideas presented thus far.&nbsp;&nbsp;