FamilySearch Wiki talk:Manual of Style: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Added some votes to the table re. History heading)
mNo edit summary
Line 114: Line 114:
|  
|  
|-
|-
| Alan
| Alan  
| X
| X  
|  
|  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| Anne
| Anne  
| X
| X  
|  
|  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| Batsondl
| Batsondl  
| X
| X  
|  
|  
|  
|  
Line 132: Line 132:
<br>
<br>


== Turabian? Shown Mills? Chigago? Oh my!  ==
== Turabian? Shown Mills? Chicago? Oh my!  ==


I'm preparing to launch [[FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives|WikiProject:Linking&nbsp;to Books in the BYU Family History Archives]] but I don't know which format to use for the inline references which will link to the digital copies of local histories online. Should I use APA? MLA? Chicago? Shown Mills? Turabian? Any ideas? It would be nice to come to a consensus before adding these 1300 references so the community won't have to come back and change their citation format later. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 17:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)  
I'm preparing to launch [[FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Linking to Books in the BYU Family History Archives|WikiProject:Linking&nbsp;to Books in the BYU Family History Archives]] but I don't know which format to use for the inline references which will link to the digital copies of local histories online. Should I use APA? MLA? Chicago? Shown Mills? Turabian? Any ideas? It would be nice to come to a consensus before adding these 1300 references so the community won't have to come back and change their citation format later. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 17:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)  
15,660

edits