73,385
edits
(box) |
(t) |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" bgcolor="#ffff99" | | | valign="middle" bgcolor="#ffff99" | | ||
Before concluding your ancestor’s name is not in the index,'''consider''': | Before concluding your ancestor’s name is not in the index, '''consider''': | ||
*The name may be spelled differently, for example, Anne instead of Ann, or Thos. instead of Thomas. Search for variant spellings. | :*The name may be spelled differently, for example, Anne instead of Ann, or Thos. instead of Thomas. Search for variant spellings. | ||
*Look for your ancestor by his or her English name, Indian name, middle name, nickname, initials, married name, or maiden name. | :*Look for your ancestor by his or her English name, Indian name, middle name, nickname, initials, married name, or maiden name. | ||
*Maybe he or she was listed under a different tribe or category than you expected. Look in each of the 29 sections of the index. | :*Maybe he or she was listed under a different tribe or category than you expected. Look in each of the 29 sections of the index. | ||
*Look for your ancestor’s relatives. Relatives may refer to your family. | :*Look for your ancestor’s relatives. Relatives may refer to your family. | ||
*If your ancestor was a Cherokee by Blood you could also search: | :*If your ancestor was a Cherokee by Blood you could also search: | ||
Blankenship, | *Bob Blankenship, ''Dawes Roll “Plus” of Cherokee Nation 1898'', 2nd ed. ([Cherokee, North Carolina]: Cherokee Roots Publication, 1994). {{WorldCat|51086958|item|disp=At various libraries (WorldCat)}}. {{FHL|710954|item|disp=FHL Q Book 970.1 B611d}}) Lists name, census card number, Miller roll application number, age, and sex. | ||
'''Rejected Applications.''' Your ancestor’s application may have been rejected. The Commission eventually rejected 60% of the applications. Only a few rejected applications are in the indexes you just searched. | '''Rejected Applications.''' Your ancestor’s application may have been rejected. The Commission eventually rejected 60% of the applications. Only a few rejected applications are in the indexes you just searched. |
edits