0
edits
Beyond Parish Registers:A Case Study (view source)
Revision as of 12:25, 16 April 2009
, 16 April 2009editing/clarifying
(editing/clarifying/adding information) |
(editing/clarifying) |
||
| Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The next available list was 1680 where we started the search in the tax lists. (See Step 4) It is interesting to note that both Jöns Torson and Asmund Torson are listed as single taxables i.e. no wives being taxed. Perhaps that is the year Jôns first wife died, and Asmund had not yet married. We can't say for sure, as the parish registers don't exist, but, the supposition has some merit. | The next available list was 1680 where we started the search in the tax lists. '''''(See Step 4)''''' It is interesting to note that both Jöns Torson and Asmund Torson are listed as single taxables i.e. no wives being taxed. Perhaps that is the year Jôns first wife died, and Asmund had not yet married. We can't say for sure, as the parish registers don't exist, but, the supposition has some merit. | ||
=== Sixth Research Step: Look for and search other types of extant records which could contain information on the ancestral family === | === Sixth Research Step: Look for and search other types of extant records which could contain information on the ancestral family === | ||