Jump to content

South Africa, Church of the Province of South Africa, Parish Registers - FamilySearch Historical Records/Known Issues: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(revised text)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


== <center>Known Issues</center>  ==
== <center>Known Issues</center>  ==


'''Question #1''': Is there a list of browse points that are incorrectly identified?<br>'''Answer #1''': The following is a list of known discrepancies in the browse point descriptions:
'''Question #1''': Is there a list of browse points that are incorrectly identified?<br>'''Answer #1''': The following is a list of known discrepancies in the browse point descriptions:
 
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, Bellville and Durbanville, All Saints''' &gt; Baptisms 1859-1971 have been mislabeled as Baptisms instead of Marriages. There are no Baptism records.  
 
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, St Mark''' &gt; Baptisms 1849-1903. The browse point has a typographical error. The records are from 1894-1903 not 1849-1903.  
 
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Kimberley, Barkly West, Klipdam and Windsorton''' &gt; Marriages 1894-1903. This browse point has been mislabeled. They are baptism records not marriages.  
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, Bellville and Durbanville, All Saints''' &gt; Baptisms 1859-1971 have been mislabeled as Baptisms instead of Marriages. There are no Baptism records.
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Kimberley, St. Cyprian''' &gt; Marriage banns 1871-1937. The browse point name is misleading. The records start at 1910 and include records up to 1964. The records are not necessarily in chronological order.  
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, St Mark''' &gt; Baptisms 1849-1903. The browse point has a typographical error. The records are from 1894-1903 not 1849-1903.
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Kimberley, Barkly West, Klipdam and Windsorton''' &gt; Marriages 1894-1903. This browse point has been mislabeled. They are baptism records not marriages.
*'''South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Kimberley, St. Cyprian''' &gt; Marriage banns 1871-1937. The browse point name is misleading. The records start at 1910 and include records up to 1964. The records are not necessarily in chronological order.
*'''South Africa &gt; Natal &gt; Natal, Mid-Illovo and Richmond, St Margaret''' &gt; Baptisms 1898-1953, marriages 1913-1975 also has death records for the years 1896-1985
*'''South Africa &gt; Natal &gt; Natal, Mid-Illovo and Richmond, St Margaret''' &gt; Baptisms 1898-1953, marriages 1913-1975 also has death records for the years 1896-1985


'''Question #2''': There appear to be some records missing from the set of records found at South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, Rondebosch, St Paul &gt; Marriages 1907-1923. Where can I see them?<br>'''Answer #2''': <br>
'''Question #2''': There appear to be some records missing from the set of records found at South Africa &gt; Cape of Good Hope &gt; Cape Town, Rondebosch, St Paul &gt; Marriages 1907-1923. Where can I see them?<br>'''Answer #2''':  
 
*Pages 170 and 171 should be found after image 87. However, this record was missed in filming and is not available.  
*Pages 170 and 171 should be found after image 87. However, this record was missed in filming and is not available.
*Page 138 found on image 179 is partially covered by a certificate. The record obscured by the certificate is not available.<br>
*Page 138 found on image 179 is partially covered by a certificate. The record obscured by the certificate is not available.<br>


12,331

edits