447
edits
South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Records (Stellenbosch Archive) - FamilySearch Historical Records/Known Issues: Difference between revisions
South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Records (Stellenbosch Archive) - FamilySearch Historical Records/Known Issues (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, 16 September 2013
, 16 September 2013Added Q/A#5, renumbered
mNo edit summary |
(Added Q/A#5, renumbered) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
'''Question #4''': Is it possible that the Middelburg records found at '''South Africa > Cape > Middelburg''' are in the wrong browse point?<br>'''Answer #4''': There is a Middelburg in Cape Province as well as one in Transvaal. From the references found in the text, it appears that these Middelburg records should be in browse point South Africa > Transvaal > Middelburg. | '''Question #4''': Is it possible that the Middelburg records found at '''South Africa > Cape > Middelburg''' are in the wrong browse point?<br>'''Answer #4''': There is a Middelburg in Cape Province as well as one in Transvaal. From the references found in the text, it appears that these Middelburg records should be in browse point South Africa > Transvaal > Middelburg. | ||
'''Question #5''': At browse point '''South Africa > Transvaal > NG Kerk''' > Baptisms, memberships, 1997-1998, A-H, there are duplicate sets of records. Images 865-1638 are duplicates of images 1-764. Images 1639-1728 are duplicates of images 765-864. Should there be other records in place of the duplicate records?<br>'''Answer # | '''Question #5''': Isn't Kanonheuwel found in the Cape province than in Free State?<br>'''Answer #5''': Yes. The browse point '''South Africa > Free State > Kanonheuwel''' should read South Africa > Cape > Kanonheuwel<br> | ||
'''Question #6''': At browse point '''South Africa > Transvaal > NG Kerk''' > Baptisms, memberships, 1997-1998, A-H, there are duplicate sets of records. Images 865-1638 are duplicates of images 1-764. Images 1639-1728 are duplicates of images 765-864. Should there be other records in place of the duplicate records?<br>'''Answer #6''': The duplication of records is an error. There are no missing records. | |||
If you encounter additional problems with this collection, feel free to report them at [mailto:support@familysearch.org support@familysearch.org]. Please include the following information: | If you encounter additional problems with this collection, feel free to report them at [mailto:support@familysearch.org support@familysearch.org]. Please include the following information: | ||