FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Professional Genealogists/Purpose: Difference between revisions

FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Professional Genealogists/Purpose (view source)

Revision as of 09:59, 30 July 2012

750 bytes added , 30 July 2012

m

added comment

VisualWikitext

Averyld

5,959

edits

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 ----
-If I&nbsp;remember correctly, the Family History Library used to have a list of professional researchers that patrons could reference if they needed professional research help. &nbsp;My understand was that the professionals were vetted both their research credentials and that they had an honest business.This protected both the reputation of FamilySearch and the Library but also mitigated fiscal exposure if a patron was unhappy with the service they received from the professional. &nbsp;The professionals list on the wiki doesn't appear to have any vetting. &nbsp;It looks like anyone, valid pros and fraudesters alike can add themselves to the list with no more than a working FamilySearch login.Additionally, I'm told that the links and text associated with advertisements were removed from the wiki over the past few years. &nbsp;The policy of putting ads back on the list flies in the face of that older policy opening up wounds from the earlier removal process. --[[User:Ldrew|Ldrew]] 20:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)&nbsp;
+If I&nbsp;remember correctly, the Family History Library used to have a list of professional researchers that patrons could reference if they needed professional research help. &nbsp;My understanding was that the professionals were vetted, both their research credentials and that they had an honest business.This protected both the reputation of FamilySearch and the Library but also mitigated fiscal exposure if a patron was unhappy with the service they received from the professional. &nbsp;The professionals list on the wiki doesn't appear to have any vetting. &nbsp;It looks like anyone, valid pros and fraudesters alike can add themselves to the list with no more than a working FamilySearch login.Additionally, I'm told that the links and text associated with advertisements were removed from the wiki over the past few years. &nbsp;The policy of putting ads back on the list flies in the face of that older policy opening up wounds from the earlier removal process. --[[User:Ldrew|Ldrew]] 20:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)&nbsp;
+I agree with the comments about vetting these people and &nbsp;if you look at the Guiding Principles of the Wiki, in the Spam section, it clearly states "That said, the wiki may not be used simply as an advertising platform. Pages should not be slanted overwhelmingly to any one vendor's products in exclusion of free sites and other vendor sites. Do not direct researchers to an expensive source when a free one will suffice. Recommend sources to users in terms of what will help them, not what will help your business." &nbsp;I think this project should have been brought before the Wiki Community for input before it was implemented. &nbsp;This goes against the community aspect of a Wiki. [[User:Averyld|averyld]] 15:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)