FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 19 July 2012: Difference between revisions

m
content
(wordsmithing)
m (content)
Line 31: Line 31:
:*Change the Manual Style regarding reference to for pay sites in the wiki. (discussed 2 weeks ago)
:*Change the Manual Style regarding reference to for pay sites in the wiki. (discussed 2 weeks ago)


::'''Present Policy'''<br>If you refer to a subscription website or one which has a charge to obtain information, use the "$" to indicate that there may be a fee for the site.  
*:*::'''Present Policy'''<br>  
::'''Proposed Policy'''<br>If you refer to a subscription website or one which has a charge to obtain information, clearly state that it is a &nbsp;“for pay” web site. For tables, you may use a symbol to refer to a footnote at the bottom of the table that states the site is a for pay site. You should use the symbol of the currency &nbsp;required by the site (such as "$" or “£”).<br>
*::If you refer to a subscription website or one which has a charge to obtain information, use the "$" to indicate that there may be a fee for the site.  
*::'''Proposed Policy'''<br>  
*::If you refer to a subscription website or one which has a charge to obtain information, clearly state that it is a &nbsp;“for pay” web site. For tables, you may use a symbol to refer to a footnote at the bottom of the table that states the site is a for pay site. You should use the symbol of the currency &nbsp;required by the site (such as "$" or “£”).<br>  
*::There are images that may require a payment on FamilySearch, (free site but may cost for certain images or people without LDS accounts).Useability testing - could it be done in a FHL class? (Carol Smith)Four leading currencies - make a small graphic that show the four symbols and just use that graphic for consistency. &nbsp;That could possibly eliminate wording. &nbsp;Lee will put together a graphic and then we'll &nbsp;see about some useability testing.
 
:


=== Business/Announcements  ===
=== Business/Announcements  ===


:*
:*Box &nbsp;on Main page - New to the Research Wiki (Lee Drew)
:*Eliminate the box or use it as a type of "billboard" with new information occassionally (make it smaller?)
:*This would take engineering currency that we don't want to lose now. &nbsp;Should we just wait for the new Home Page design. &nbsp;If we can change the wording now, we would like ideas for that.


=== Moderators and Adopters  ===
=== Moderators and Adopters  ===
Line 54: Line 61:
:-User Guidance Team
:-User Guidance Team


This really isn't a discussion about the article, and does not actually have any chance of helping prevent inadvertent or intentional edits to the bibdesc coding. Because it acts as a barrier to the important role of healthy dialogue regarding the content of an article, I propose that this text be removed from all talk pages where it appears. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 00:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC) <br>  
This really isn't a discussion about the article, and does not actually have any chance of helping prevent inadvertent or intentional edits to the bibdesc coding. Because it acts as a barrier to the important role of healthy dialogue regarding the content of an article, I propose that this text be removed from all talk pages where it appears. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 00:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)  
<br> It makes sense to embed some explanation of the bibdesc coding within each page using the nowiki code.[[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 01:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 
Use the Talk page for the intended purpose, rather than an instructional page. &nbsp;Dorothy is willing to have missionaries remove the existing text from pages that have it.&nbsp;<br> <br> It makes sense to embed some explanation of the bibdesc coding within each page using the nowiki code.[[User:Donjgen|Donjgen]] 01:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)  


*Revisit the topic from last week's meeting regarding the text and link pointing to "[[Help:How to Create Source Citations For FamilySearch Historical Records Collections|Help:How to Create Source Citations for FamilySearch Historical Record Collections]]" on all HRC&nbsp;articles.&nbsp; Discussion on the [https://familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?p=66860#post66860 forum thread]. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC) <br>
*Revisit the topic from last week's meeting regarding the text and link pointing to "[[Help:How to Create Source Citations For FamilySearch Historical Records Collections|Help:How to Create Source Citations for FamilySearch Historical Record Collections]]" on all HRC&nbsp;articles.&nbsp; Discussion on the [https://familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?p=66860#post66860 forum thread]. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC) <br>  
*Lise has prepared a document with a proposal for a different placement of the citations and how to give readers help with citations


*Style guide question about references: What is the current thought about showing references within the text versus footnoting the reference? Is there a style guide suggestion? Whick format is more useful to the wiki user? Does putting the reference within the text clutter the page?
*Style guide question about references: What is the current thought about showing references within the text versus footnoting the reference? Is there a style guide suggestion? Whick format is more useful to the wiki user? Does putting the reference within the text clutter the page?
5,959

edits