Template talk:Societies: Difference between revisions

comment
(additional info about editing the template)
(comment)
Line 42: Line 42:
With the < includeonly > --> < /includeonly > both above and below the bullet point like the other sections, but it didn't work, so I removed it (Note I added extra spaces in the code here, so the text would show up in on the discussion page. The result on the template page was code in bold on the top-right section of the page, plus other issues. Can we removed the hidden comments, and just have a template similar to the Wiki Tech Community meeting agenda? That one works nicely and is easy to use both in wikicode and the rich editor. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 04:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
With the < includeonly > --> < /includeonly > both above and below the bullet point like the other sections, but it didn't work, so I removed it (Note I added extra spaces in the code here, so the text would show up in on the discussion page. The result on the template page was code in bold on the top-right section of the page, plus other issues. Can we removed the hidden comments, and just have a template similar to the Wiki Tech Community meeting agenda? That one works nicely and is easy to use both in wikicode and the rich editor. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 04:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


== Suggestion for layout ==
== Suggestion for layout ==


Steve, thanks for your hard work on this template -- it looks like it has a lot of great prompts for people to add the right kinds of content. Would it be possible to have the infobox display to the right of (and level with) the table of contents like we used to do with pictures on place pages? I think the Dorset Family History Society page, for example, would look better if the layout were done this way. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 02:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Steve, thanks for your hard work on this template -- it looks like it has a lot of great prompts for people to add the right kinds of content. Would it be possible to have the infobox display to the right of (and level with) the table of contents like we used to do with pictures on place pages? I think the Dorset Family History Society page, for example, would look better if the layout were done this way. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 02:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
:*The prompts were designed by Elaine. --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 04:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
oversight
8,840

edits