2,175
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page (view source)
Revision as of 16:12, 2 July 2009
, 2 July 2009Comment
m (add comment) |
(Comment) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Please leave the Portal. It works well and I do not feel we should change what is working well. | Please leave the Portal. It works well and I do not feel we should change what is working well. | ||
:Take a look - [[Pembrokeshire|Pembrokeshire]] - the UnPortal and [[Portal:Pembrokeshire|Pembrokeshire]] the Portal. That is the difference. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 21:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | :Take a look - [[Pembrokeshire|Pembrokeshire]] - the UnPortal and [[Portal:Pembrokeshire|Pembrokeshire]] the Portal. That is the difference. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 21:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Hello Anderson, I have not heard nor seen any compelling reason one way or another. Sure, some portal pages may be underdeveloped or look bad, but I am sure some non-portal pages can be in the same condition. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 22:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
=== Samuelsen === | === Samuelsen === | ||
I am all for the UN-portal. Been waiting for the changeover since May 5 or was it 13th, day before the NGS conference. Lost links are easy to track down than you think and added back on the UnPortal page. Bread crumb trail is not a big deal when done right. | I am all for the UN-portal. Been waiting for the changeover since May 5 or was it 13th, day before the NGS conference. Lost links are easy to track down than you think and added back on the UnPortal page. Bread crumb trail is not a big deal when done right. | ||