2,175
edits
(Add my comment) |
(Add my comment) |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
[[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 12:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
I agree with the Chicago Manual of Style, due to wide recognition/acceptance. | I agree with the Chicago Manual of Style, due to wide recognition/acceptance. | ||
For the large project of linking the BYU Family History Archives local histories, what do you see for the link to that entry as well as the FHLC entry. Just let one link to the FHLC do the job, or should there be the other link, such as you have done for WorldCat and the FHLC? [[User:Adkinswh|Adkinswh]] 13:00, 30 Apr 2009 (UTC) | For the large project of linking the BYU Family History Archives local histories, what do you see for the link to that entry as well as the FHLC entry. Just let one link to the FHLC do the job, or should there be the other link, such as you have done for WorldCat and the FHLC? [[User:Adkinswh|Adkinswh]] 13:00, 30 Apr 2009 (UTC) | ||
As long as I recall correctly, someone was going to talk to the FHLC people about opening up the standard numbers that is used by WorldCat, etc. that is currently stored internally by the FHLC people. Okay, I am having a slight brain-cramp on the name of this. I hope you understand what I am trying to type. Anyway, that seems like it would be great. Also, I am of the opinion, if at all possible, that the links in FHLC references should be done in a template, plug-in, or something. When the FHLC changes, it would be very nice to change it in one place. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 16:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== MOS is guidelines hopefully, not policies == | == MOS is guidelines hopefully, not policies == |
edits