FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 14 Feb 2012
Revision as of 11:54, 27 January 2023 by Batsondl (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "[http://meetingplace.ldschurch.org/a/70ec431dabb0d9bd3506f4e1fe658fa7 Join the meeting]" to "Join the meeting")
MeetingPlace ID: 0000; Join the meeting; Dial-in number: 000-000-0000 1 p.m. Mountain time on Tuesdays
- You can join up to 10 minutes early. If you try to join the meeting at any other time, you will get an error that the meeting doesn't exist.
- Prior to joining the meeting for the first time, run the MeetingPlace Test to verify that you can participate in a web meeting.
|
Introduce new members[edit | edit source]
Kudos go to ...[edit | edit source]
Updates and follow up[edit | edit source]
- Widget for Wiki - any progress? (Nathan)
Business/Announcements[edit | edit source]
- New Where are you researching? page -- janellv (talk| contribs)
- When we add the extension that makes the Talk pages much easier to use, can/should the talk pages be used for those who are researching in those areas to talk to each other? That duplicates the forums in some ways. Is that good or bad?
- Bad to have multiple places for people to go to.
- Good to give a specific place for questions rather than all of England, can go to the parish page
- We need to start interlinking more - post wiki links on forums, post video links on wiki, post forum link on talk pages, etc.
- In the past people have posted info about specific individuals - the wiki is not for that, for individuals, and where is the line if we start talking about questions about research?
- Promoting a project or something new in the wiki -- janellv (talk| contribs)
- Discussion about making it easier for people to find information, add things - how do we make the wiki more user friendly in the beginning?
- http://www.wikihow.com/Special:CommunityDashboard is a great example of how a community has made a "maintenance" page more user friendly
Style Guide Discussions[edit | edit source]
- How much detail is necessary for grammar and punctuation? It seems to me that our style guide is currently very heavy in non-wiki-specific details? Lise 20:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Current detail is heavy on punctuation, grammar, etc. Is this really necessary?
- How do we present material for the overall look of the page?
- How do we use the Style guide page?
- Does the page need to be reorganized with the most important information for new contributors at the top?
- Have the "meat" of the article on the page and then have links to detail pages, such as grammar, etc.
- We need a link from edit mode to Manual of Style. Could it be added to information at bottom of page or added to Nav box on the side? Would people use the page more often if it were easier to access when editing?
- How much detail is necessary for grammar and punctuation? It seems to me that our style guide is currently very heavy in non-wiki-specific details? Lise 20:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Project Help Requests[edit | edit source]
- Need help with your project? See a project that needs to be done? Add it here:
Training Requests[edit | edit source]
Improve the Wiki[edit | edit source]
Moderators and Adopters[edit | edit source]
Forums Overview[edit | edit source]
- Be part of the solution! Make your opinions known! Post comments to an existing thread or start a new discussion at Wiki Contributors Corner forum.
| Current forum threads of interest:
New since last week
Comments added since last week
Decisions made since last week |
|