90,866
edits
(pay sites allowed forum thread) |
(→Moderators and Adopters: defining a stub) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
=== Moderators and Adopters === | === Moderators and Adopters === | ||
:*Discussion of proposed definition of a stub: "An article that does not completely cover the subject matter, and which could be | :*Discussion of proposed definition of a stub: "An article that does not completely cover the subject matter, and which could be expanded." [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 15:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)<br> | ||
:*Discussion of proposed placement of stub template. County | :** I think that definition is too broad. Even a developed page could be said not to cover a subject completely. Rather than define what a stub is not, I feel that we should be defining a stub by what it is. "Minimal information, capable of expansion" --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 16:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:*Discussion of proposed placement of stub template. County pages currently display the stub at the top. I would propose that we establish a consistent pattern of placing stub templates at the bottom. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 15:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)<br> | |||
:*Depending on the outcome of discussion, I would propose that moderators and page adopters be encouraged to review all stub articles within their geography/subject, remove the stub designation for any article that does not fit the description, and move stub templates to the bottom of any articles that are stubs. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 15:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)<br> | :*Depending on the outcome of discussion, I would propose that moderators and page adopters be encouraged to review all stub articles within their geography/subject, remove the stub designation for any article that does not fit the description, and move stub templates to the bottom of any articles that are stubs. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 15:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)<br> | ||
edits