1,147
edits
(Reorder first to paragraphs) |
(Add reference notes) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
We live in a day of collaboration. With tools such as the new FamilySearch Tree, it is more important than ever that we produce correct and verifiable genealogy. Properly utilizing information from a source is essential for producing correct genealogies. | We live in a day of collaboration. With tools such as the new FamilySearch Tree, it is more important than ever that we produce correct and verifiable genealogy. Properly utilizing information from a source is essential for producing correct genealogies. | ||
This class teaches industry best practices (the BCG Genealogical Proof Standard and associated Evidence Analysis Research Process ) established by the country’s foremost genealogists. From ''sources'' we find ''information''. From ''information ''we select ''evidence''. From ''evidence ''we make ''conclusions''. ''Conclusions'' reference ''citations''. ''Citations ''point back to ''sources''. | This class teaches industry best practices (the BCG [[Genealogical Proof Standard]] and associated [[Evidence Analysis Research Process]]<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, ''Evidence Analysis: A Research Process Map'', laminated study guide (Washington, D.C.: Board for Certification of Genealogists, 2006).</ref>) established by the country’s foremost genealogists. From ''sources'' we find ''information''. From ''information ''we select ''evidence''. From ''evidence ''we make ''conclusions''. ''Conclusions'' reference ''citations''. ''Citations ''point back to ''sources''. | ||
The Genealogical Proof Standard is a straight-forward means of producing genealogies that are verifiable and correct. In simple terms: | The Genealogical Proof Standard is a straight-forward means of producing genealogies that are verifiable and correct. In simple terms: | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
“Just because you read it in print or see it on the Internet doesn’t make it true.” | “Just because you read it in print or see it on the Internet doesn’t make it true.” | ||
Many erroneous pedigrees exist in print or on the Internet. Some are the results of careless research or typographical errors which are propagated from pedigree to pedigree. Some are out-right fraudulent. Fraudulent genealogies are often created to qualify for membership in lineage societies such as the Sons of the American Revolution or the Mayflower Society. Gustave Anjou, a rather famous perpetrator, fabricated genealogies as a professional genealogist. | Many erroneous pedigrees exist in print or on the Internet. Some are the results of careless research or typographical errors which are propagated from pedigree to pedigree. Some are out-right fraudulent. Fraudulent genealogies are often created to qualify for membership in lineage societies such as the Sons of the American Revolution or the Mayflower Society. Gustave Anjou, a rather famous perpetrator, fabricated genealogies as a professional genealogist.<ref>Milton Rubincam, ''Pitfalls in Genealogical Research'' (Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1987), 62-4.</ref> | ||
Records themselves are not above mistakes. The military pension application of Alonzo Pearis Raymond indicates he was born in 1819 when he was actually born two years later. His death certificate says his parents were from England; in fact they were from New England. | Records themselves are not above mistakes. The military pension application of Alonzo Pearis Raymond indicates he was born in 1819 when he was actually born two years later. His death certificate says his parents were from England; in fact they were from New England. | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
We must take several factors into account to judge the quality of information. | We must take several factors into account to judge the quality of information. | ||
Primary information carries more weight than secondary information. “Information is primary if it was made orally or in writing (or even pictorially as in a painting or photograph) by someone in a position to know firsthand (such as an eyewitness or participant) and recorded in a timely manner while memory is fresh.” | Primary information carries more weight than secondary information. “Information is primary if it was made orally or in writing (or even pictorially as in a painting or photograph) by someone in a position to know firsthand (such as an eyewitness or participant) and recorded in a timely manner while memory is fresh.”<ref>Christine Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case'', 3rd ed. (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 6-7.</ref> | ||
The timing of creation of the record affects its accuracy. The longer an eyewitness waits to record an event, the more their memory is subject to error. The information is considered secondary when not recorded promptly. It should be kept in mind that whether considered primary or secondary, we consider the accuracy of the information to decline over time. | The timing of creation of the record affects its accuracy. The longer an eyewitness waits to record an event, the more their memory is subject to error. The information is considered secondary when not recorded promptly. It should be kept in mind that whether considered primary or secondary, we consider the accuracy of the information to decline over time.<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, ''Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace'', 2nd ed. (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 37.</ref> | ||
The quality of the information is affected by the informant, the person who supplied the information. How did he get his information? Was he an eyewitness? Was he biased? The quality of the information is affected by the recorder. Was he acting in an official capacity? | The quality of the information is affected by the informant, the person who supplied the information. How did he get his information? Was he an eyewitness? Was he biased?<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 6-7, 14, 53.</ref> The quality of the information is affected by the recorder. Was he acting in an official capacity? | ||
The quality of the information is affected by the motivations of the informant and the recorder. Many military records contain erroneous birth dates provided by volunteers too young to sign up. Pensioners may lie about eligibility requirements such as length of service or marriage date. People may claim to be older or younger than they actually are. Applicants may fabricate information to qualify to join a lineage society. | The quality of the information is affected by the motivations of the informant and the recorder. Many military records contain erroneous birth dates provided by volunteers too young to sign up. Pensioners may lie about eligibility requirements such as length of service or marriage date. People may claim to be older or younger than they actually are. Applicants may fabricate information to qualify to join a lineage society.<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 15.</ref> | ||
When primary information is copied from an original, the information remains primary, even though the new source is a derivative source. Level 4: Proficient Genealogists Understanding the information we see in records depends on understanding the world in which it was recorded and the reasons for why it was recorded. As the old saying goes, “times, they are a changing.” Definitions change. Standards evolve. Laws are created or amended. Paradigms shift. Context is always evolving. | When primary information is copied from an original, the information remains primary, even though the new source is a derivative source.<ref>Rose, ''Genealogical Proof Standard'', 8.</ref> | ||
= Level 4: Proficient Genealogists = | |||
Understanding the information we see in records depends on understanding the world in which it was recorded and the reasons for why it was recorded. As the old saying goes, “times, they are a changing.” Definitions change. Standards evolve. Laws are created or amended. Paradigms shift. Context is always evolving. | |||
For example, the meaning of the abbreviation “Ia” depends on when and where it was used. Whereas today IA is the postal abbreviation for Iowa, in the 19th century it was often used as the abbreviation for Indiana. Ancestry.com seems to have missed this point in their 1850 U.S. Census database. Many of the 100,000 Indianans they indicate were born in Iowa were actually born in Indiana. | For example, the meaning of the abbreviation “Ia” depends on when and where it was used. Whereas today IA is the postal abbreviation for Iowa, in the 19th century it was often used as the abbreviation for Indiana. Ancestry.com seems to have missed this point in their 1850 U.S. Census database. Many of the 100,000 Indianans they indicate were born in Iowa were actually born in Indiana. | ||
Line 90: | Line 94: | ||
Stellar genealogists are able to tease information out of a record that eludes the grasp of other genealogists. | Stellar genealogists are able to tease information out of a record that eludes the grasp of other genealogists. | ||
As an example, genealogists hate alphabetized census records because alphabetizing all the names removes information about who lived next to whom. Elizabeth Shown Mills faced such a problem with a tax list organized by first letter of last name. She noticed groups of strictly alphabetized surnames seemed to match the tax officials’ visits to neighborhoods. This information allowed her to break through a longstanding brick wall. | As an example, genealogists hate alphabetized census records because alphabetizing all the names removes information about who lived next to whom. Elizabeth Shown Mills faced such a problem with a tax list organized by first letter of last name. She noticed groups of strictly alphabetized surnames seemed to match the tax officials’ visits to neighborhoods. This information allowed her to break through a longstanding brick wall.<ref>Elizabeth Shown Mills, “‘Margaret’s Baby’s Father and the Lessons He Taught Me’: Identifying the father of an illegitimate child,” BCG lecture series for FamilySearch personnel, 12 October 2009.</ref> | ||
= Continuing Education = | = Continuing Education = | ||
Line 121: | Line 125: | ||
*Rubincam, Milton. ''Pitfalls in Genealogical Research''. Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1987. | *Rubincam, Milton. ''Pitfalls in Genealogical Research''. Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1987. | ||
*Stevenson, Noel C. ''Genealogical Evidence: A Guide to the Standard of Proof'', revised edition. Laguna Hills : Aegean Park Press, 1989. Using legal terminology is outdated. | *Stevenson, Noel C. ''Genealogical Evidence: A Guide to the Standard of Proof'', revised edition. Laguna Hills : Aegean Park Press, 1989. Using legal terminology is outdated. | ||
= Notes = | |||
<references /> | |||
[[Category:Genealogy_Education]] [[Category:Baby_Steps]] | [[Category:Genealogy_Education]] [[Category:Baby_Steps]] |
edits