Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825
edits
FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 14 Feb 2012: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 14 Feb 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 10:13, 14 February 2012
, 14 February 2012links to pages in copyright thread
(copyright thread still to add links) |
(links to pages in copyright thread) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
'''New since last week''' | '''New since last week''' | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13780 Avoiding copyright issues and creating user-friendly content] Here is one block of content, and what I am suggesting that we might do with it (and similar content): As it is today: Church Records; Proposed representation: Church Records. Some comments have also been added. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13780 Avoiding copyright issues and creating user-friendly content] Here is one block of content, and what I am suggesting that we might do with it (and similar content): As it is today: [[Horne, Surrey#Church records|Church Records]]; Proposed representation: [[User:Lembley/sandbox6|Church Records]]. Some comments have also been added. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 77: | Line 78: | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||