FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 14 Feb 2012: Difference between revisions

copyright thread still to add links
(England census thread)
(copyright thread still to add links)
Line 70: Line 70:
'''New since last week'''  
'''New since last week'''  


*<br>
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13780 Avoiding copyright issues and creating user-friendly content] Here is one block of content, and what I am suggesting that we might do with it (and similar content): As it is today: Church Records; Proposed representation: Church Records. Some comments have also been added.
<br>


'''Comments added since last week'''  
'''Comments added since last week'''  
Line 76: Line 77:
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem.  
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem.  
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted.
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted.
<br>
<br>


Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825

edits