Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825
edits
(England census thread) |
(copyright thread still to add links) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
'''New since last week''' | '''New since last week''' | ||
*<br> | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13780 Avoiding copyright issues and creating user-friendly content] Here is one block of content, and what I am suggesting that we might do with it (and similar content): As it is today: Church Records; Proposed representation: Church Records. Some comments have also been added. | ||
<br> | |||
'''Comments added since last week''' | '''Comments added since last week''' | ||
| Line 76: | Line 77: | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||