Approver, Reviewer, editor, pagecreator
46,825
edits
(status of the wiki thread) |
(England census thread) |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
*[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=10282 Status of the wiki today] Session time outs fixed. The notification about a page being deleted says that the page is new. Engineering has been notified and will correct the problem. | ||
* | *[https://www.familysearch.org/learn/forums/en/showthread.php?t=13454 England Census] Kent is the perfect example of why we still recommend microfilm numbers even though some of the records are posted online. Kent recently enacted a 100 rule policy on online publication of images. In cases where ANY record on a film exceeds the 100 year cut-off, the entire film is restricted. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||