2,736
edits
(add {{Unresolved|Approve/formulate a consensus policy}}) |
(said in 2011) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
:I'm not sure this is making any sense tonight. Maybe I needed to wait until a new day, but these are at least some initial thoughts.[[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 05:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | :I'm not sure this is making any sense tonight. Maybe I needed to wait until a new day, but these are at least some initial thoughts.[[User:Jbparker|Jbparker]] 05:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
As Wikipedia says: | |||
"It is useful to remember that consensus is an ongoing process on Wikipedia. It is often better to accept a less-than-perfect compromise – with the understanding that the page is gradually improving – than to try to fight to implement a particular 'perfect' version immediately. The quality of articles with combative editors is, as a rule, far lower than that of articles where editors take a longer view." I think it is that way in our wiki as well.[[User:HoleDL|Dawne]] 19:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Wikipedia's model == | == Wikipedia's model == |
edits