Jump to content

Template talk:FHL: Difference between revisions

Reply
(added to title number discussion)
(Reply)
Line 204: Line 204:
:I am working on getting information from HQ that will dictate how we interface with the FHLC. Depending on their answers will depend on how this template will expand. It is not a problem with how it is written. I have asked for suggestions a while back and implemented what was requested. Recent requests require information that I am trying to request. Answers probably will not come until after NGS. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 05:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
:I am working on getting information from HQ that will dictate how we interface with the FHLC. Depending on their answers will depend on how this template will expand. It is not a problem with how it is written. I have asked for suggestions a while back and implemented what was requested. Recent requests require information that I am trying to request. Answers probably will not come until after NGS. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 05:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


I recently had a conversation with a few of the higher-ups over the catalog. One said that the title number would be one of the most persistent items in the catalog and the other identfied the number after "%2Fitem%2" in the URL of an item in the catalog as being the title number. Thomas, with this information, can the template documentation be modified? Also, adding the disp= information into the template would help as well. I can work on this, if you would like me to.  [[User:Randyhoffman|Randyhoffman]] 21:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
I recently had a conversation with a few of the higher-ups over the catalog. One said that the title number would be one of the most persistent items in the catalog and the other identfied the number after "%2Fitem%2" in the URL of an item in the catalog as being the title number. Thomas, with this information, can the template documentation be modified? Also, adding the disp= information into the template would help as well. I can work on this, if you would like me to. [[User:Randyhoffman|Randyhoffman]] 21:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
:That is good to know, Randy. However, I have heard from someone else that it was not persistent. I am not sure who to believe at this moment. I will be changing the docs hopefully soon. [[User:Thomas_Lerman|Thomas_Lerman]] 23:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


== Which to keep and which to get rid of  ==
== Which to keep and which to get rid of  ==
2,175

edits