oversight
8,840
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProjects Seeking Contributors: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:WikiProjects Seeking Contributors (view source)
Revision as of 15:01, 3 December 2010
, 3 December 2010reply
No edit summary |
(reply) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:I think the details in the main sections should be in tables rather than in sub-sections as each sub-section is no more than a sentence. I think it would help produce a more readable/useful table of contents. --From [[User:Cottrells|Steve]] through email. | :I think the details in the main sections should be in tables rather than in sub-sections as each sub-section is no more than a sentence. I think it would help produce a more readable/useful table of contents. --From [[User:Cottrells|Steve]] through email. | ||
::I like the idea. Are there example out there somewhere that we could look at? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 16:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ::I like the idea. Are there example out there somewhere that we could look at? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 16:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I like the tables, but the text is hard to read without the grid lines. Is it possible to add them? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 19:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ::I like the tables, but the text is hard to read without the grid lines. Is it possible to add them? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 19:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Hi Fran, when I finished editing the page [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/index.php?title=Projects_Seeking_Contributors&oldid=491220 the tables did have borders/gridlines]. I will add them back, but I'm guessing you did not remove them on purpose so can only suspect that the rich text editor was the culprit. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 20:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | :::Hi Fran, when I finished editing the page [https://wiki.familysearch.org/en/index.php?title=Projects_Seeking_Contributors&oldid=491220 the tables did have borders/gridlines]. I will add them back, but I'm guessing you did not remove them on purpose so can only suspect that the rich text editor was the culprit. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] 20:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::You're right, I didn't change the table. I guess this is another bug that tier 3 needs to add to JIRA. =[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 21:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Bloggers' day and what's new? == | == Bloggers' day and what's new? == | ||
FamilySearch recently held a [http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/insider/2010/10/22/FamilySearchBloggersDay.aspx "Bloggers' Day"] event with some of the bloggers on the web who consistently blog about family history. One of the suggestions made that day about the wiki, was that they would like an easy way to see what new projects the community is working on in the wiki. As this page is redesigned, we should keep in mind the need to highlight new projects and maybe even the progress of all current projects. Any ideas? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 16:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC) (Use your search engine (like Google) and search for "FamilySearch Bloggers day" for links to many of the blog posts or Twitter posts about the discussions that occurred throughout the day.) | FamilySearch recently held a [http://blog.familytreemagazine.com/insider/2010/10/22/FamilySearchBloggersDay.aspx "Bloggers' Day"] event with some of the bloggers on the web who consistently blog about family history. One of the suggestions made that day about the wiki, was that they would like an easy way to see what new projects the community is working on in the wiki. As this page is redesigned, we should keep in mind the need to highlight new projects and maybe even the progress of all current projects. Any ideas? --[[User:JensenFA|Fran]] 16:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC) (Use your search engine (like Google) and search for "FamilySearch Bloggers day" for links to many of the blog posts or Twitter posts about the discussions that occurred throughout the day.) | ||