23,837
edits
mNo edit summary |
m (agenda item) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
While the commercial license has been implemented with Wikipedia (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License]) , it is interesting to note that we have been unable to find any company who has chosen to risk using this license in a commercial way. The general ambiguity of the Creative Commons licenses appears to have limited commercial companies from using the content, possibly due to the potential risk of unclear interpretations of the terms of these licenses. | While the commercial license has been implemented with Wikipedia (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License]) , it is interesting to note that we have been unable to find any company who has chosen to risk using this license in a commercial way. The general ambiguity of the Creative Commons licenses appears to have limited commercial companies from using the content, possibly due to the potential risk of unclear interpretations of the terms of these licenses. | ||
=== REdefining role of Moderator === | === REdefining role of Moderator === | ||
Yes I did emphasize "re". | |||
It is more clear and more obvious there is a need to redfine the term "Moderator". | |||
The role needs to include the emphasis on additional responsibility of "assisting" the contributor including leading the contributors to various tools when asked by email. [[User:Dsammy|dsammy]] 21:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Stay Informed == | == Stay Informed == |
edits