FamilySearch Wiki talk:The Un-Portal Page: Difference between revisions

Comment
(Question)
(Comment)
Line 95: Line 95:
I am all for the UN-portal. Been waiting for the changeover since May 5 or was it 13th, day before the NGS conference. Lost links are easy to track down than you think and added back on the UnPortal page. Bread crumb trail is not a big deal when done right.  
I am all for the UN-portal. Been waiting for the changeover since May 5 or was it 13th, day before the NGS conference. Lost links are easy to track down than you think and added back on the UnPortal page. Bread crumb trail is not a big deal when done right.  


=== '''Seoane''' ===
=== '''Seoane''' ===


I know that the deadline has past but I just came back from vacation and learned about this discusion. just wanted to put y two cents in. From the conversation it seams that both the Un-Portaled pages are searchable and the current Portal pages are searchable. The question from a consumer standpoint that should be answered is:  
I know that the deadline has past but I just came back from vacation and learned about this discusion. just wanted to put y two cents in. From the conversation it seams that both the Un-Portaled pages are searchable and the current Portal pages are searchable. The question from a consumer standpoint that should be answered is:  


What is the easiest format for me to contribute in?  
What is the easiest format for me to contribute in?  
Line 103: Line 103:
If the question has been answered as to searchability then why not change over to the most patron friendly format. From the discussion it looks like the Un-Portal pages are the eisiest to use.  
If the question has been answered as to searchability then why not change over to the most patron friendly format. From the discussion it looks like the Un-Portal pages are the eisiest to use.  


Do we want a greater amount of individuals to contribute or not?
Do we want a greater amount of individuals to contribute or not?  


''' '''
:I agree . . . if the "un-portal" pages are truly easier to create and edit, then we should use that instead. I personally do not feel like we have heard much response to which is easier or not. Yes, we want to get a much greater number of people to contribute and therefore the easier the better. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 15:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2,175

edits