4,497
edits
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats: Difference between revisions
FamilySearch Wiki talk:Source Citation Formats (view source)
Revision as of 21:39, 14 June 2009
, 14 June 2009Responded to Thomas' comment.
(Added comment to maybe solve Alan's issue with footnote consistency.) |
(Responded to Thomas' comment.) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Looking at some pages, you will find a single source referenced multiple times, other pages will have each reference having its own reference to the same source. Does that make sense? An example of what I am referring to is [[New Sweden|New Sweden]]. This is an excellent page with excellent sources. I noticed that the first source is cited multiple times and then the second source is repeated multiple times. According to Diltsgd in the Talk page, the footnotes have problems when the second source is referenced once. If this is the case, that is a very bad bug in my opinion. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 16:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC) | Looking at some pages, you will find a single source referenced multiple times, other pages will have each reference having its own reference to the same source. Does that make sense? An example of what I am referring to is [[New Sweden|New Sweden]]. This is an excellent page with excellent sources. I noticed that the first source is cited multiple times and then the second source is repeated multiple times. According to Diltsgd in the Talk page, the footnotes have problems when the second source is referenced once. If this is the case, that is a very bad bug in my opinion. [[User:Thomas Lerman|Thomas Lerman]] 16:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for the heads-up Thomas. I've added this issue to my user talk page's list of usability concerns to address with our coders. [[User:Ritcheymt|Ritcheymt]] 03:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
=== Allow more citation styles than Chicago, Turabian, or Shown Mills? === | === Allow more citation styles than Chicago, Turabian, or Shown Mills? === | ||