Jump to content

Julian and Gregorian Calendars: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
There is some uncertainty for the dates between 1 January and 25 March in the years from 1582 till the year the Gregorian Calendar was adopted. To avoid any confusion, write the date with both years numbers. For example - 14 February 1699/1700. At the time it would be considered 1699 according to the Julian Calendar, then in effect. But now it would be considered 1700 according to the Gregorian Calendar. Using the double-year dating and understand its purpose can be helpful in recording historical events.  
There is some uncertainty for the dates between 1 January and 25 March in the years from 1582 till the year the Gregorian Calendar was adopted. To avoid any confusion, write the date with both years numbers. For example - 14 February 1699/1700. At the time it would be considered 1699 according to the Julian Calendar, then in effect. But now it would be considered 1700 according to the Gregorian Calendar. Using the double-year dating and understand its purpose can be helpful in recording historical events.  


Here are two links which show when various political entities switched from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar: first [http://www.searchforancestors.com/utility/gregorian.html chart]  and secondHere is a [http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/calendar/ converter] that converts dates from a variety of calendars are among the tools available to navigate through this maze. Interesting historical reading about how a monarch's reign influenced the English calendar is found in the article [[Regnal Years in England]].  
Here are two links which show when various political entities switched from the [http://www.searchforancestors.com/utility/gregorian.html Julian to ]the Gregorian calendar: first [http://www.searchforancestors.com/utility/gregorian.html chart]  and secondHere is a [http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/calendar/ converter] that converts dates from a variety of calendars are among the tools available to navigate through this maze. Interesting historical reading about how a monarch's reign influenced the English calendar is found in the article [[Regnal Years in England]].  


{| class="wikitable sortable FCK__ShowTableBorders"
{| class="wikitable sortable FCK__ShowTableBorders"
Line 66: Line 66:
|-
|-
| [[Scotland]]  
| [[Scotland]]  
| 1600<ref name="Blackburn">Blackburn &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp; Holford-Strevens (1999), p. 784.</ref><ref>John J. Bond, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=bzAWAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;printsec=frontcover#PPR17,M1 Handy-book of rules and tables for verifying dates with the Christian era]'' Scottish decree on pp. xvii–xviii.</ref>  
| 1600<ref name="Blackburn">Blackburn &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp; Holford-Strevens (1999), p. 784.</ref><ref>John J. Bond, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=bzAWAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;printsec=frontcover#PPR17,M1 Handy-book of rules and tables for verifying dates with the Christian era]'' Scottish decree on pp. xvii–xviii.</ref>  
| 1752
| 1752
|-
|-
1,766

edits