FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 20 Mar 2012: Difference between revisions

clarifying that sectional invitations are not categorized as "stubs"
(clarifying purpose of placing maintenance templates at the bottom)
(clarifying that sectional invitations are not categorized as "stubs")
Line 33: Line 33:
:*Placement of maintenance or administrative templates - put at end of article to leave space at the top of the page for content directed at readers (not contributors).  
:*Placement of maintenance or administrative templates - put at end of article to leave space at the top of the page for content directed at readers (not contributors).  
:*Could we have moderators and adopters move these templates?  Ask them to do this through the monthly newsletter?  Contact individually - we are lacking contact information on many of them and the majority are not responding to recent contacts.  Darris may have contact information that we don't have.  
:*Could we have moderators and adopters move these templates?  Ask them to do this through the monthly newsletter?  Contact individually - we are lacking contact information on many of them and the majority are not responding to recent contacts.  Darris may have contact information that we don't have.  
:*Historical records pages have some sectional invitations to expand the section.  
:*Historical records pages have some sectional invitations to expand the section. These templates are not categorized as "stubs".<br>
:*Dorthy Horan's team will take care of Historical records pages  
:*Dorthy Horan's team will take care of Historical records pages  
:*Once an article is no longer a stub, will people understand that they can still contribute? &nbsp; The percentage of people adding is minimal.  
:*Once an article is no longer a stub, will people understand that they can still contribute? &nbsp; The percentage of people adding is minimal.  
3,911

edits