90,866
edits
(wording) |
(→Wording: done) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
So I went ahead and changed the logo. I did not change the link name as I would prefer the link works. i am going to, in the near future perhaps move the FamilySearch Record Search article to a new name. Something like "FamilySearch Collections" same article new title. | So I went ahead and changed the logo. I did not change the link name as I would prefer the link works. i am going to, in the near future perhaps move the FamilySearch Record Search article to a new name. Something like "FamilySearch Collections" same article new title. | ||
== Wording | == Wording == | ||
I would suggest that the words "that is" and "for free online" be removed from the template. I'm concerned the word "free" may be misleading. There are "free index/for-pay image" collections and "free index/free image" collections. The template doesn't differentiate. The wording must either differentiate (and be absolutely accurate) or the word "free" should be removed. Also, stating that a collection is available at FamilySearch.org (a website) provides sufficient clarity so that people understand it's available online. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC) | I would suggest that the words "that is" and "for free online" be removed from the template. I'm concerned the word "free" may be misleading. There are "free index/for-pay image" collections and "free index/free image" collections. The template doesn't differentiate. The wording must either differentiate (and be absolutely accurate) or the word "free" should be removed. Also, stating that a collection is available at FamilySearch.org (a website) provides sufficient clarity so that people understand it's available online. [[User:Lembley|Lise]] 20:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed. Done. --[[User:Cottrells|Steve]] {{toolbar|[[User talk:Cottrells|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cottrells|contribs]]}} 08:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC) |
edits