|
|
Line 41: |
Line 41: |
| *On the bullet list item about '''consulting a third party''', some explanation as to where to find a third party who is objective. | | *On the bullet list item about '''consulting a third party''', some explanation as to where to find a third party who is objective. |
| *A brief explanation of the difference between '''mediation''' and '''arbitration''' and whether one is expected to pursue them in a certain order. | | *A brief explanation of the difference between '''mediation''' and '''arbitration''' and whether one is expected to pursue them in a certain order. |
|
| |
| == Text shouting?<span id="fck_dom_range_temp_1311287396630_230" /> ==
| |
|
| |
| The policy currently states that "rude... impolite communications are unacceptable. Does that include text shouting, or the use of caps to "shout" a point across in a discussion page or email? [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 22:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == What exactly is rude or impolite? ==
| |
|
| |
| Since "rude... impolite communications are unacceptable," does that include telling someone they are "way behind" in their understanding of how to construct Web pages? [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 22:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Criticizing the person rather than the idea ==
| |
|
| |
| It seems a good addition or rule of thumb to add to this page is that one may express polite criticism of ideas, but one should not criticize people. So if you don't like the heading Joe added to a page, don't tell Joe he's backwards; talk to Joe about the merits of the heading and offer a possible alternative. [[User:RitcheyMT|RitcheyMT]] 22:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
| |